The Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Packaging Pictograms Via Eye Tracking Technique

Overview

Journal Innov Pharm

Date 2022 Oct 28

PMID 36304680

Authors

Merve Memisoglu

Yener Girisken

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

: Various visual tools are used to improve medication adherence in communication with the patient. Pharmaceutical pictograms are one such tool utilized within this communication process. : The aim of this study is to investigate the eye movement of the participants and to recommend the most suitable location of pictograms on pharmaceutical packaging accordingly. It also aims to show whether there is a significant correlation between the effectiveness of pictograms and the health literacy, age, and gender of the participant. : Forty-two participants were exposed to sixty stimuli showing four different pharmaceutical packages as an on-screen slide show. Participants were asked what they understood from the pictograms on the packaging, and their eye movements were examined using eye tracking to determine heat maps and areas of interest, and to measure the time to first fixation, total fixation duration, and percentage fixated. : The study revealed that the understanding level of the pictograms was determined at between 11.9 % and 71.43 %. Among the pictograms, only a small percentage 13% - namely numbers 12 and 13 which were prepared and validated by the FIP, achieved a score of 67%, the minimum level of comprehension in accordance with ISO 3684. We observed that participants fixated at least once on the pictograms up to 95% of the time. The pictograms were found to be most easily noticed at the center with a secondary focus area towards center-right parts of the packaging. Vertical design was highly engaging for participants regardless of health literacy. The significant relationship was found between the understanding of the pictograms and gender when mean values are examined. However, no significant relationship was between health literacy and pictogram comprehension level. : This is the first study to have used eye tracking to analyze pictograms added to real pharmaceutical packaging on the market. Its findings can guide pharmaceutical companies to design their packaging in a way that prioritizes patient safety, and to place critical pictograms more effectively. These results can be adapted medication label design in hospitals to promote appropriate use. Studies to improve patient adherence by using pictograms should be diversified.

References

van Beusekom M, Kerkhoven A, Bos M, Guchelaar H, van den Broek J . The extent and effects of patient involvement in pictogram design for written drug information: a short systematic review. Drug Discov Today. 2018; 23(6):1312-1318. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.013. View

Golay A . Pharmacoeconomic aspects of poor adherence: can better adherence reduce healthcare costs?. J Med Econ. 2011; 14(5):594-608. DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2011.597808. View

Heisz J, Pottruff M, Shore D . Females scan more than males: a potential mechanism for sex differences in recognition memory. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(7):1157-63. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612468281. View

Braich P, Almeida D, Hollands S, Coleman M . Effects of pictograms in educating 3 distinct low-literacy populations on the use of postoperative cataract medication. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011; 46(3):276-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2011.05.004. View

Soares M . Legibility of USP pictograms by clients of community pharmacies in Portugal. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012; 35(1):22-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-012-9698-z. View

Howard D, Gazmararian J, Parker R . The impact of low health literacy on the medical costs of Medicare managed care enrollees. Am J Med. 2005; 118(4):371-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.010. View

Leporini C, De Sarro G, Russo E . Adherence to therapy and adverse drug reactions: is there a link?. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014; 13 Suppl 1:S41-55. DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2014.947260. View

Houts P, Doak C, Doak L, Loscalzo M . The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 61(2):173-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004. View

Leong M, Tam V, Xu T, Peters M . Understanding Medication Schedules: Do Pictograms Help?. J Patient Saf. 2017; 14(2):e19-e24. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000241. View

10.

Bix L, Bello N, Auras R, Ranger J, Lapinski M . Examining the conspicuousness and prominence of two required warnings on OTC pain relievers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(16):6550-5. PMC: 2662957. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810665106. View

11.

Brown M, Bussell J . Medication adherence: WHO cares?. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011; 86(4):304-14. PMC: 3068890. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0575. View

12.

Pires C, Vigario M, Cavaco A . Graphical content of medicinal package inserts: an exploratory study to evaluate potential legibility issues. Health Info Libr J. 2015; 33(2):121-39. DOI: 10.1111/hir.12128. View

13.

Ozdemir H, Alper Z, Uncu Y, Bilgel N . Health literacy among adults: a study from Turkey. Health Educ Res. 2010; 25(3):464-77. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyp068. View

14.

Kheir N, Awaisu A, Radoui A, El Badawi A, Jean L, Dowse R . Development and evaluation of pictograms on medication labels for patients with limited literacy skills in a culturally diverse multiethnic population. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013; 10(5):720-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.003. View

15.

Katz M, Kripalani S, Weiss B . Use of pictorial aids in medication instructions: a review of the literature. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006; 63(23):2391-7. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp060162. View

16.

Dowse R, Ehlers M . Medicine labels incorporating pictograms: do they influence understanding and adherence?. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 58(1):63-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.012. View

17.

van Beusekom M, Bos M, Wolterbeek R, Guchelaar H, van den Broek J . Patients' preferences for visuals: differences in the preferred level of detail, type of background and type of frame of icons depicting organs between literate and low-literate people. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 98(2):226-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.023. View

18.

Iuga A, McGuire M . Adherence and health care costs. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014; 7:35-44. PMC: 3934668. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S19801. View

19.

Barros I, Alcantara T, Mesquita A, Santos A, Paixao F, Lyra Jr D . The use of pictograms in the health care: a literature review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013; 10(5):704-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.002. View

20.

Montagne M . Pharmaceutical pictograms: a model for development and testing for comprehension and utility. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013; 9(5):609-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.04.003. View