» Articles » PMID: 36304057

Oocyte Cryopreservation at a Young Age Provides an Effective Strategy for Expanding Fertile Lifespan

Overview
Date 2022 Oct 28
PMID 36304057
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With an upward trend in delaying parenthood, women across the world face an increasing risk of age-related infertility and involuntary childlessness. Elective oocyte banking strategies offer women the possibility to protect part of their reproductive potential until personal finances, personal relationship, or career have stabilized. Timely collection and cryopreservation of oocytes when they are most competent and chromosomal abnormality rates have not yet escalated are crucial for achieving high live births through fertilization (IVF) treatment at a later stage. To promote reproductive autonomy, women shall be informed about the decrease in fertility rates that sharply intensifies from the age of 35 years and the strategies available to maintain their reproductive potential. Together with this information, women should also recognize the limitations of available strategies including expected live birth rates, costs of the procedures, and overall approach performance, which is mainly associated with age at cryopreservation, number of oocytes banked, and age at accessing the banked oocytes. Evidence-based statistics are not yet available due to the relatively short period in which oocyte cryopreservation has been offered for elective purposes and the scarce number of patients returning for accessing their oocytes. However, to evaluate the applicability of fertility cryopreservation on a large scale, several theoretical models have been proposed to assess the expected efficacy and overall cost-effectiveness of different oocyte banking strategies. In this study, we review current oocyte cryopreservation methodologies, their applications, and outcomes. Moreover, we summarize current evidence regarding known parameters affecting oocyte banking efficacy. Finally, we discuss key points that could play a role in improving access to the service and optimization of oocyte banking frameworks.

Citing Articles

Acceptance rates and reasons for social oocyte cryopreservation among women: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tandogan O, Kugcumen G, Satilmis I J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 40024978 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03425-5.


Balancing choice and socioeconomic realities: analyzing behavioral and economic factors in social oocyte cryopreservation decisions.

Gonen L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1467213.

PMID: 39758347 PMC: 11695191. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1467213.


Metformin alleviates cryoinjuries in porcine oocytes by reducing membrane fluidity through the suppression of mitochondrial activity.

Zhou D, Liu H, Zheng L, Liu A, Zhuan Q, Luo Y Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):925.

PMID: 39090373 PMC: 11294456. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06631-6.


Realities and Hopes in Social Freezing: A Developing Practice to Stop Reproductive Ageing.

Sadeghi M J Reprod Infertil. 2023; 24(1):1-2.

PMID: 36919050 PMC: 10008134. DOI: 10.18502/jri.v24i1.11902.


Oncofertility in pediatric patients: current perspectives.

Marques R, Oura M, Dionisio R, Rodrigues C, Lorenzo J Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2022; 26(3):165-173.

PMID: 36381665 PMC: 9641635. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2022.120362.

References
1.
Te Velde E, Pearson P . The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2002; 8(2):141-54. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/8.2.141. View

2.
Devine K, Mumford S, Goldman K, Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Propst A . Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(6):1446-53.e1-2. PMC: 4457614. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.029. View

3.
van Loendersloot L, Moolenaar L, Mol B, Repping S, van der Veen F, Goddijn M . Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(11):3054-60. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der284. View

4.
Mertes H, Pennings G . Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23(7):824-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.010. View

5.
Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Karlstrom P, Tyden T . Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2005; 21(2):558-64. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei367. View