» Articles » PMID: 36303672

Non-Invasive and Mechanism-Based Molecular Assessment of Endometrial Receptivity During the Window of Implantation: Current Concepts and Future Prospective Testing Directions

Overview
Date 2022 Oct 28
PMID 36303672
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Suboptimal endometrial receptivity and altered embryo-endometrial crosstalk account for approximately two-thirds of human implantation failures. Current tests of the window of implantation, such as endometrial thickness measurements and the endometrial receptivity assay, do not consistently improve clinical outcomes as measured by live birth rates. Understanding the mechanisms regulating the endometrial receptivity during the window of implantation is a critical step toward developing clinically meaningful tests. In this narrative review, the available literature is evaluated regarding mechanisms that regulate the endometrial receptivity during the window of implantation and the current tests developed. Overall, both animal and human studies point to five possible and interrelated mechanisms regulating the endometrial window of implantation: suitable synchrony between endometrial cells, adequate synchrony between the endometrium and the embryo, standard progesterone signaling and endometrial responses to progesterone, silent genetic variations, and typical morphological characteristics of the endometrial glands. The biological basis of current clinical markers or tests of window of implantation is poor. Future studies to elucidate the mechanisms shaping the window of implantation and to investigate the potential markers based on these mechanisms are required. In addition, molecular testing of the endometrium at single-cell resolution should be an initial step toward developing clinically meaningful tests for the optimal window of implantation. As understanding of the optimal window of implantation continues to evolve, one can envision the future development of non-invasive, mechanism-based testing of the window of implantation.

Citing Articles

The study on the clinical efficacy of endometrial receptivity analysis and influence factors of displaced window of implantation.

Xu S, Diao H, Xiong Y, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Zhang Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7326.

PMID: 40025209 PMC: 11873133. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91745-y.


Development of a New Personalized Molecular Test Based on Endometrial Receptivity and Maternal-Fetal Dialogue: Adhesio.

Bourdiec A, Messaoudi S, El Kasmi I, Chow-Shi-Yee M, Kadoch E, Stebenne M Biochem Genet. 2024; .

PMID: 39488671 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-024-10950-y.


Pregnancy rate and time to pregnancy after recurrent implantation failure (RIF)-a prospective cohort follow-up study.

Stevens Brentjens L, Roumen R, Smits L, Derhaag J, Romano A, van Golde R J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(11):3061-3070.

PMID: 39349892 PMC: 11621263. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03257-9.


Endometrial E-cadherin and N-cadherin Expression during the Mid-Secretory Phase of Women with Ovarian Endometrioma or Uterine Fibroids.

Yun B, Yun N, Lee J, Go M, Jang H, Park J J Pers Med. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39338174 PMC: 11433430. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14090920.


Effects of Variable Embryo Transfer on the Variable Window of Implantation and Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes.

Shrivastava D, Dutta S Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60020.

PMID: 38854330 PMC: 11162824. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60020.


References
1.
Ng E, Chan C, Tang O, Yeung W, Ho P . Changes in endometrial and subendometrial blood flow in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 18(2):269-75. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60265-9. View

2.
Lopez E, Vue Z, Broaddus R, Behringer R, Gladden A . The ERM family member Merlin is required for endometrial gland morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2018; 442(2):301-314. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.08.006. View

3.
Paria B, Huet-Hudson Y, Dey S . Blastocyst's state of activity determines the "window" of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(21):10159-62. PMC: 47733. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10159. View

4.
Jia S, Yang Y, Lang J, Sun P, Leng J . Plasma miR-17-5p, miR-20a and miR-22 are down-regulated in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2012; 28(2):322-30. PMC: 3733164. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des413. View

5.
Enciso M, Carrascosa J, Sarasa J, Martinez-Ortiz P, Munne S, Horcajadas J . Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(2):220-228. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex370. View