» Articles » PMID: 36295619

The Effect of Laser Micro Grooved Platform Switched Implants and Abutments on Early Crestal Bone Levels and Peri-Implant Soft Tissues Post 1 Year Loading Among Diabetic Patients-A Controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract

The study aimed to compare the mean crestal bone level (CBL) and peri-implant soft tissue parameters in laser micro-grooved (LMG) platform switched implants and abutments (I&A) post 1 year of functional loading among non-diabetic and type II diabetic individuals. Patients with an edentulous site having minimum bone height and width of ≥13 mm and ≥6 mm, respectively, were divided into two groups: (i) Non-diabetic-8 (control) and (ii) diabetic-8 (test). LMG Implants were placed and loaded immediately with a provisional prosthesis. Mean crestal bone level (MCBL) was evaluated radiographically at baseline and at 1 year. Peri-implant attachment level (PIAL) and relative position of the gingival margin (R-PGM) were recorded. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) level and implant survival rate (ISR) were evaluated at 1 year. Early MCBL within the groups 1 year postloading was similar both mesially and distally (control-0.00 to 0.16 mm and 0.00 to 0.17 mm, respectively; test-0.00 to 0.21 mm and 0.00 to 0.22 mm, respectively) with statistical significance ( ≤ 0.003, ≤ 0.001 and ≤ 0.001, ≤ 0.001, respectively). However, intergroup comparison showed no significant difference statistically in the MCBL in 1 year post functional loading. The peri-implant soft tissue parameters showed no significant difference between the groups. ISQ level between both groups did not reveal any significant changes ( ≤ 0.92), and ISR was 100%. LMG Implants resulted in minimal and comparable early crestal bone loss and soft tissue changes post 1 year of functional loading in moderately controlled diabetic and non-diabetic individuals, suggesting that this could be a reliable system for use in systemically compromised individuals.

Citing Articles

Effect of laser-microtextured abutments on peri-implant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huaman-Mendoza A, Bommarito R, Hagy M, Vilela N, Romano M, Braga M Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(7):388.

PMID: 38898305 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05785-1.

References
1.
Ferraris S, Warchomicka F, Barberi J, Cochis A, Scalia A, Spriano S . Contact Guidance Effect and Prevention of Microfouling on a Beta Titanium Alloy Surface Structured by Electron-Beam Technology. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021; 11(6). PMC: 8227382. DOI: 10.3390/nano11061474. View

2.
Yoon H, Heo S, Koak J, Kim S, Lee S . Effect of bone quality and implant surgical technique on implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3(1):10-5. PMC: 3076567. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.10. View

3.
Tallarico M, Esposito M, Xhanari E, Caneva M, Meloni S . Computer-guided vs freehand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 5-year postloading results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018; 11(2):203-213. View

4.
Nevins M, Nevins M, Camelo M, Boyesen J, Kim D . Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28(2):111-21. View

5.
Iezzi G, Pecora G, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A . Histologic evaluation of 3 retrieved immediately loaded implants after a 4-month period. Implant Dent. 2006; 15(3):305-12. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000234644.23432.19. View