» Articles » PMID: 36294483

Comparison of Morphological and Digital-Assisted Analysis for BCL6 Endometrial Expression in Women with Endometriosis

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Oct 27
PMID 36294483
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BCL6 (B-cell lymphoma 6) is a proto-oncogene and transcriptional repressor initially described as being involved in B-cell lymphoma. Recently, this factor has been identified as a promising tissue biomarker which could be used to diagnose women affected by endometriosis. Previous studies used HSCORE for BCL6 staining quantification in the endometrium. However, this semi-quantitative technique of analysis has some limitations, including a lack of objectivity, robustness, and reproducibility that may lead to intra- and inter-observer variability. Our main goal was to develop an original computer-assisted method to quantify BCL6 staining from whole-slide images reliably. In order to test the efficiency of our new digital method of quantification, we compared endometrial BCL6 expression between fertile and infertile women without or with different stages of endometriosis by using the widely used HSCORE analysis and our new automatic digital image analysis. We find a higher expression of BCL6 in the endometrium of infertile women with endometriosis and women with stage IV endometriosis. Furthermore, we demonstrate a significant correlation between the two types of independent measurements, indicating the robustness of results and also the reliability of our computer-assisted method for BCL6 quantification. In conclusion, our work, by using this original computer-assisted method, enables BCL6 quantification more objectively, reliably, robustly, and promptly compared to HSCORE analysis.

Citing Articles

Role of Molecular Biomarkers in Endometriosis-Related Infertility: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Koutalia N, Gkrozou F, Vatopoulou A, Lentzaris D, Skentou C, Paschopoulos M Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e59288.

PMID: 38813329 PMC: 11135608. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59288.


Nonsurgical approaches to the diagnosis and evaluation of endometriosis.

Young S Fertil Steril. 2023; 121(2):140-144.

PMID: 38103884 PMC: 11149605. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.020.


Epigenetic Dysregulation in Endometriosis: Implications for Pathophysiology and Therapeutics.

Marquardt R, Tran D, Lessey B, Rahman M, Jeong J Endocr Rev. 2023; 44(6):1074-1095.

PMID: 37409951 PMC: 10638603. DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnad020.

References
1.
Nezhat C, Rambhatla A, Miranda-Silva C, Asiaii A, Nguyen K, Eyvazzadeh A . BCL-6 Overexpression as a Predictor for Endometriosis in Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization. JSLS. 2021; 24(4). PMC: 7757768. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00064. View

2.
Giacomini E, Minetto S, Li Piani L, Pagliardini L, Somigliana E, Vigano P . Genetics and Inflammation in Endometriosis: Improving Knowledge for Development of New Pharmacological Strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(16). PMC: 8396487. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22169033. View

3.
Brichant G, Laraki I, Henry L, Munaut C, Nisolle M . New Therapeutics in Endometriosis: A Review of Hormonal, Non-Hormonal, and Non-Coding RNA Treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(19). PMC: 8508913. DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910498. View

4.
Koninckx P, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Tahlak M, Keckstein J, Wattiez A . The epidemiology of endometriosis is poorly known as the pathophysiology and diagnosis are unclear. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 71:14-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.08.005. View

5.
Agrawal S, Tapmeier T, Rahmioglu N, Kirtley S, Zondervan K, Becker C . The miRNA Mirage: How Close Are We to Finding a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarker in Endometriosis? A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(2). PMC: 5855821. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020599. View