» Articles » PMID: 36294427

Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Oct 27
PMID 36294427
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: There is wide variation in the reported prevalence rates for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). There is also wide variation in the rate at which surgical interventions for pelvic organ prolapse are performed, as well as the type of interventions undertaken. As part of the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI), our committee was tasked to produce evidence-based pathways for the surgical management of POP, any associated stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and bowel dysfunction. (2) Methods: To enable us to generate such evidence, we undertook a thorough search for the POP surgery-related, English-language scientific literature published up to April 2021. (3) Results: The committee evaluated the literature and made recommendations based on the Oxford grading system. (4) Conclusions: This review serves to provide a summary of the 2021 ICI surgical management of an evidence-based prolapse pathway and outline the evidence used to inform this guidance.

Citing Articles

Erroneous and Incomplete Reporting of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System.

Younes M, Raoofi M, Carey M Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 36(2):243-252.

PMID: 39565394 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05988-w.


Sacrocolpopexy: Alternatives to Mesh Grafts.

Yong C, Raoofi M, Carey M Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 36(1):3-10.

PMID: 39476292 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05956-4.


Vaginal Hysterectomy and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: History and Recent Developments.

de Tayrac R, Cosson M Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(7):1363-1373.

PMID: 38691125 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05783-7.


Changes in Stress Urinary Incontinence Symptoms after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: a Nationwide Cohort Study (FINPOP).

Karjalainen P, Tolppanen A, Wihersaari O, Nieminen K, Mattsson N, Jalkanen J Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(4):909-919.

PMID: 38546868 PMC: 11052860. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05760-0.


Comparative analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A propensity score matching study.

Chen Y, Zhou Y, Tan L, Chen S, Wu C, Liang Y Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e19698.

PMID: 37809779 PMC: 10558931. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19698.


References
1.
Wong V, Shek K, Rane A, Goh J, Krause H, Dietz H . Is levator avulsion a predictor of cystocele recurrence following anterior vaginal mesh placement?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42(2):230-4. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12433. View

2.
van IJsselmuiden M, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder C . Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial). BJOG. 2020; 127(10):1284-1293. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16242. View

3.
Olsen A, Smith V, Bergstrom J, Colling J, Clark A . Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89(4):501-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6. View

4.
Barber M . Symptoms and outcome measures of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 48(3):648-61. DOI: 10.1097/01.grf.0000170424.11993.73. View

5.
Pauls R, Segal J, Silva W, Kleeman S, Karram M . Sexual function in patients presenting to a urogynecology practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006; 17(6):576-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-006-0070-5. View