» Articles » PMID: 36290424

Quantifications of Mandibular Trabecular Bone Microstructure Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Age Estimation: A Preliminary Study

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Oct 27
PMID 36290424
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study is two-fold: first, to correlate the values for each of the trabecular bone microstructure (TBM) parameters to the individual’s chronological age and sex, thereby facilitating the assessment of potential age and sex-related changes in trabecular bone microstructure parameters in the mandible; and second, to quantify the trabecular microstructural parameters in relation to chronological age. Twenty cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans were retrieved retrospectively from a database of adult patients with ages ranging in age from 22 to 43 years. In the mandible, the volume of interest included the inter-dental space between the second mandibular premolar and the first mandibular molar, as well as the trabecular space beneath and between the apices. Using the AnalyzeDirect 14.0 software, the DICOM images of CBCT scans were pre-processed, transformed, segmented using a novel semi-automatic threshold-guided method, and quantified. In addition, TBM parameters were derived, and statistical analysis was conducted using a Pearson correlation test with two tails. All parameters exhibited no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between chronological age and sex. Statistically significant negative correlations were found between Tb. N (r = −0.489), BS/TV (r = −0.527), and chronological age (p = 0.029 and p = 0.017, respectively). Only Tb. N and BS/TV exhibited an inverse relationship with chronological age. Numerous studies have quantified the trabecular architecture of the jaw bones, but none have found a correlation between the quantified trabecular parameters and chronological age. The digital imprints produced by radiographic imaging can serve as biological profiles for data collection.

Citing Articles

Effect of different implant positions for two implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a retrospective 5-years radiographic evaluation of the circumferential peri-implant bone loss and posterior ridge resorptive changes.

Mourad K, Emera R, Habib A BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1161.

PMID: 39350107 PMC: 11443777. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04871-w.


Trabecular bone microstructure parameters as predictors for chronological age: a systematic review.

Tabassum A, Chainchel Singh M, Ibrahim N, Sanjeevan V, Mohd Yusof M Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024; .

PMID: 39098862 DOI: 10.1007/s12024-024-00864-x.


Facts to Consider in Developing Materials That Emulate the Upper Jawbone: A Microarchitecture Study Showing Unique Characteristics at Four Different Sites.

Lim E, Ngeow W, Kadir K, Naidu M Biomimetics (Basel). 2023; 8(1).

PMID: 36975345 PMC: 10046344. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics8010115.

References
1.
Wade A, Nelson A, Garvin G, Holdsworth D . Preliminary radiological assessment of age-related change in the trabecular structure of the human os pubis. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(2):312-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01643.x. View

2.
Deguette C, Ramond-Roquin A, Rouge-Maillart C . Relationships between age and microarchitectural descriptors of iliac trabecular bone determined by microCT. Morphologie. 2017; 101(333):64-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.morpho.2017.03.008. View

3.
Yip J, Borrell L, Cho S, Francisco H, Tarnow D . Association between oral bisphosphonate use and dental implant failure among middle-aged women. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39(4):408-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01854.x. View

4.
Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D . Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 26(1):e1-7. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12315. View

5.
He J, Zhao B, Deng C, Shang D, Zhang C . Assessment of implant cumulative survival rates in sites with different bone density and related prognostic factors: an 8-year retrospective study of 2,684 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30(2):360-71. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3580. View