» Articles » PMID: 36290394

Effects of Knee Extension Joint Angle on Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Activation and Exerted Torque in Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Oct 27
PMID 36290394
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the effects of knee joint angle on muscle activation, exerted torque, and whether the knee angle affects the muscle activation−torque ratio. Nine healthy adult male participants participated in the study. They performed maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) at six (80°, 90°, 100°, 110°, 120°, and 130°) different knee joint angles (i.e., angles between the thigh and shin bones). Their maximal torque was assessed utilizing an isokinetic chair, while their muscle activation (root mean square [RMS]) was assessed using an eight-channel single differential surface EMG sensor. For the purposes of the torque−knee angle relationship and muscle activation−knee angle relationship, the torque and RMS were normalized relative to the maximal value obtained by each participant. To evaluate the muscle activation−torque ratio in function of knee angle, RMS was normalized relative to the corresponding torque obtained at each knee angle. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to investigate the effects of knee angle on muscle activation, torque, and muscle activation−torque ratio. There was a significant effect of knee joint angle on normalized torque (F = 27.521, p < 0.001), while the activation of vastus lateralis and vastus medialis remained unchanged. The changes in knee angle affected the muscle activation−torque ratio of vastus lateralis (Chi-square = 16.246, p = 0.006) but not the vastus medialis. These results suggest that knee joint angles from 80° to 130° provide a stable milieu for muscle electrification, while mechanical factor such as knee joint angle (i.e., lever arm length) affect the torque output when one needs to contract quadriceps maximally during the isometric contraction.

Citing Articles

Reliability and Sensitivity of Enode/Vmaxpro Sensor for Muscle Power Assessment.

Markovic M, Toskic L, Stankovic V, Arsenijevic R, Aksovic N, Bjelica B Life (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39768412 PMC: 11676481. DOI: 10.3390/life14121706.


New prediction equations for knee isokinetic strength in young and middle-aged non-athletes.

Zhang Y, Chen K, Liu K, Wang Q, Ma Y, Pang B BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2558.

PMID: 38129858 PMC: 10734189. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17478-7.

References
1.
Enoka R, Duchateau J . Inappropriate interpretation of surface EMG signals and muscle fiber characteristics impedes understanding of the control of neuromuscular function. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015; 119(12):1516-8. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00280.2015. View

2.
Brown S, Brughelli M, Hume P . Knee mechanics during planned and unplanned sidestepping: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014; 44(11):1573-88. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0225-3. View

3.
Farina D, Cescon C, Merletti R . Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG. Biol Cybern. 2002; 86(6):445-56. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-002-0309-2. View

4.
Moxley Scarborough D, Krebs D, Harris B . Quadriceps muscle strength and dynamic stability in elderly persons. Gait Posture. 1999; 10(1):10-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00018-1. View

5.
Akima H, Tomita A, Ando R . Effect of knee joint angle on the neuromuscular activation of the quadriceps femoris during repetitive fatiguing contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019; 49:102356. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102356. View