» Articles » PMID: 36289135

Tailoring the Sampling Time of Single-sample GFR Measurement According to Expected Renal Function: a Multisite Audit

Overview
Journal EJNMMI Phys
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Oct 26
PMID 36289135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The 2018 BNMS Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) guidelines recommend a single-sample technique with the sampling time dictated by the expected renal function, but this is not known with any accuracy before the test. We aimed to assess whether the sampling regime suggested in the guidelines is optimal and determine the error in GFR result if the sample time is chosen incorrectly. We can then infer the degree of flexibility in the sampling regime.

Methods: Data from 6328 patients referred for GFR assessment at 6 different hospitals for a variety of indications were reviewed. The difference between the single-sample (Fleming) GFR result at each sample time and the slope-intercept GFR result at each hospital was calculated. A second dataset of 777 studies from one hospital with nine samples collected from 5 min to 8 h post-injection was analysed to provide a reference GFR to which the single-sample results were compared.

Results: Recommended single-sample times have been revised: for an expected GFR above 90 ml/min/1.73m a 2-h sample is recommended; between 50 and 90 ml/min/1.73m a 3-h sample is recommended; and between 30 and 50 ml/min/1.73m a 4-h sample is recommended. Root mean square error in single-sample GFR result compared with slope-intercept can be kept less than or equal to 3.30 ml/min/1.73m by following these recommendations.

Conclusion: The results of this multisite study demonstrate a reassuringly wide range of sample times for an acceptably accurate single-sample GFR result. Modified recommended single-sample times have been proposed in line with the results, and a lookup table has been produced of rms errors across the full range of GFR results for the three sample times which can be used for error reporting of a mistimed sample.

Citing Articles

Comparison of plasma clearance of [Cr]CrEDTA based on three, two and single samples to measure the glomerular filtration rate in patients with solid tumors: a prospective cross-sectional analysis.

Gomes A, Coura Filho G, Gil Junior L, Caires R, Burdmann E, Buchpiguel C Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024; 79:100427.

PMID: 38945113 PMC: 11261263. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100427.


A Cross-Sectional Study of Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Butler A, Lubbad W, Akbar S, Kilpatrick E, Sathyapalan T, Atkin S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(9).

PMID: 38732117 PMC: 11084759. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094899.

References
1.
McMeekin H, Wickham F, Fongenie B, Burniston M . Accuracy of next-day single-sample measurement for low glomerular filtration rate and comparison with same-day slope-intercept glomerular filtration rate. Nucl Med Commun. 2020; 42(2):169-172. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001313. View

2.
Fleming J, Zivanovic M, Blake G, Burniston M, Cosgriff P . Guidelines for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate using plasma sampling. Nucl Med Commun. 2004; 25(8):759-69. DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000136715.71820.4a. View

3.
McMeekin H, Wickham F, Barnfield M, Burniston M . A systematic review of single-sample glomerular filtration rate measurement techniques and demonstration of equal accuracy to slope-intercept methods. Nucl Med Commun. 2015; 37(7):743-55. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000448. View

4.
Hutton L, Porter C, Morgan A, Bradley K, McGowan D . An investigation into the accuracy of using serum creatinine estimated glomerular filtration rate to predict measured glomerular filtration rate. Nucl Med Commun. 2019; 40(4):349-352. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000980. View

5.
Murray A, Lawson R, Cade S, Hall D, Kenny B, OShaughnessy E . UK audit of glomerular filtration rate measurement from plasma sampling in 2013. Nucl Med Commun. 2014; 35(11):1096-106. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000185. View