» Articles » PMID: 36286210

Safety and Efficacy of a First-Line Chemotherapy Tailored by G8 Score in Elderly Metastatic or Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastro-Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Real-World Analysis

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric (GC) and gastro-esophageal cancer (GEC) are common neoplasms in the elderly. However, in clinical practice, the correct strategy for elderly patients who might benefit from chemotherapy (CT) is unknown. Prospective data are still poor. In this context, we performed a retrospective analysis of GC patients aged ≥75 years and treated at our institutions. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients with confirmed metastatic GC or GEC, treated with an upfront CT. Inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥75 years, PS 0−2, normal bone marrow/liver/renal function and no major comorbidities. All patients received a G8 score, and some patients with G8 ≤14 received a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The primary goal was to perform a safety evaluation based on the incidence of adverse events (AE), and the secondary goal was to determine the efficacy (PFS and OS). The chi-square test and the Kaplan−Meier method were used to estimate the outcomes. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: Toxicity rates were quite low: G1/G2 (51.1%) and G3/G4 (25.5%). No toxic deaths were reported. The median PFS was 6.21 months and the median OS 11 months. The G8 score and PS ECOG significantly influenced both PFS and OS. A statistically significant correlation among G8, weight loss, hypoalbuminemia and risk of G3/G4 adverse events was also found. Conclusion: Our research on selected elderly patients did not detect broad differences of efficacy and tolerability compared to a young population. Our study, although retrospective and small-sized, showed that G8 score might be an accurate tool to identify elderly GC/GEC patients who could be safely treated with CT, further recognizing patients who could receive a doublet CT and who may require a single agent chemotherapy or a baseline dose reduction.

Citing Articles

Minimally invasive surgery versus open gastrectomy for older patients with gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis.

Yamamoto M, Omori T, Masuike Y, Shinno N, Hara H, Sugase T Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025; 9(1):69-78.

PMID: 39759980 PMC: 11693573. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12842.

References
1.
Hurria A, Gupta S, Zauderer M, Zuckerman E, Cohen H, Muss H . Developing a cancer-specific geriatric assessment: a feasibility study. Cancer. 2005; 104(9):1998-2005. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21422. View

2.
Aapro M, Kohne C, Cohen H, Extermann M . Never too old? Age should not be a barrier to enrollment in cancer clinical trials. Oncologist. 2005; 10(3):198-204. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-3-198. View

3.
Lawton M, Brody E . Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9(3):179-86. View

4.
Extermann M, Hurria A . Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(14):1824-31. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6559. View

5.
Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, Mohile S, Wedding U, Basso U, Colloca G . Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations†. Ann Oncol. 2014; 26(2):288-300. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu210. View