» Articles » PMID: 36286087

Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Deficit-Oriented and Asset-Oriented Psychological Outcomes in the Workplace: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Digital psychological interventions can target deficit-oriented and asset-oriented psychological outcomes in the workplace. This review examined: (a) the effectiveness of digital interventions for psychological well-being at work, (b) associations with workplace outcomes, and (c) associations between interventions' effectiveness and their theory-base.

Methods: six electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-experimental studies. The methodological quality of studies that used randomisation was conducted with the "Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias" tool, while the "JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist" was used for non-randomised studies. Studies' theory-base was evaluated using an adaptation of the "theory coding scheme" (TSC). Due to heterogeneity, narrative synthesis was performed.

Results: 51 studies were included in a synthesis describing four clusters of digital interventions: (a) cognitive behavioural therapy, (b) stress-management interventions and workplace well-being promotion, (c) meditation training and mindfulness-based interventions, and (d) self-help interventions. Studies demonstrated a high risk of contamination effects and high attrition bias. Theory-informed interventions demonstrated greater effectiveness. Cognitive behavioural therapy demonstrated the most robust evidence for reducing depression symptoms among healthy employees. With the exception of the Headspace application, there was weak evidence for meditation training apps, while relaxation training was a key component of effective stress-management interventions.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

Cameron G, Mulvenna M, Ennis E, ONeill S, Bond R, Cameron D JMIR Ment Health. 2025; 12:e67785.

PMID: 39854722 PMC: 11806266. DOI: 10.2196/67785.


Differential attrition and engagement in randomized controlled trials of occupational mental health interventions in person and online: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

de Miquel C, Haro J, van der Feltz-Cornelis C, Ortiz-Tallo A, Chen T, Sinokki M Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024; 50(8):588-601.

PMID: 39072699 PMC: 11616721. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4173.


Preschool- and childcare center-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable intake in preschool children in the United States: a systematic review of effectiveness and behavior change techniques.

Hasan F, Nguyen A, Reynolds A, You W, Zoellner J, Nguyen A Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):66.

PMID: 37268953 PMC: 10239084. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01472-8.

References
1.
Carissoli C, Villani D, Riva G . Does a meditation protocol supported by a mobile application help people reduce stress? Suggestions from a controlled pragmatic trial. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015; 18(1):46-53. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0062. View

2.
Heckenberg R, Hale M, Kent S, Wright B . An online mindfulness-based program is effective in improving affect, over-commitment, optimism and mucosal immunity. Physiol Behav. 2018; 199:20-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.11.001. View

3.
Hekler E, Michie S, Pavel M, Rivera D, Collins L, Jimison H . Advancing Models and Theories for Digital Behavior Change Interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(5):825-832. PMC: 5506832. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.013. View

4.
Spadaro K, Hunker D . Exploring The effects Of An online asynchronous mindfulness meditation intervention with nursing students On Stress, mood, And Cognition: A descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016; 39:163-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.006. View

5.
Imamura K, Kawakami N, Furukawa T, Matsuyama Y, Shimazu A, Umanodan R . Effects of an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention on improving work engagement and other work-related outcomes: an analysis of secondary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Environ Med. 2015; 57(5):578-84. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000411. View