» Articles » PMID: 36284744

Performing Normality in Working Life Among Heavy Substance Users

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 Oct 26
PMID 36284744
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Work is an important part of most people's everyday lives and well-being. Substance use by employees is associated with several negative consequences, such as absence from work and poor work performance. The study examines the strategies through which people who have problems with substance use produce a "normal" self and avoid becoming stigmatised in the workplace. The study uses data from in-depth unstructured life story interviews, which were conducted over phone with 13 people. The participants had developed various problematic heavy substance use habits. The interviews were analysed by applying interactional analysis and by using Goffman's concepts of "normality", "embarrassment", "face-work", "stigma" and "performance". The analysis identified multiple strategies the participants used to produce normality and to avoid embarrassment and stigmatisation at work. These include skilful use of drugs in order not to show withdrawal symptoms, various ways of hiding their heavy substance use, frequent change of jobs, the maintenance of a clean and professional look, and attributing the absence from work to mental or physical illness. Moreover, the participants strategically avoided social contacts in which embarrassing situations could arise. When this was not possible, they manipulated their corporeal looks by hiding such kinds of bodily marks that would connote abnormality. The analysis points out that maintaining normality at work does not only refer to the efforts of trying to hide the effects of the drugs on behaviours and the body. It also reveals that the participants used substances to be able to perform energetically their work tasks, and in this way present themselves as normal workers. This ambivalence in performing normality makes the work life of people who use substances challenging.

Citing Articles

Digital screens and children.

Hellman M Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022; 39(5):469-472.

PMID: 36284742 PMC: 9549218. DOI: 10.1177/14550725221125586.

References
1.
Buvik K, Moan I, Halkjelsvik T . Alcohol-related absence and presenteeism: Beyond productivity loss. Int J Drug Policy. 2018; 58:71-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.05.005. View

2.
Wogen J, Restrepo M . Human Rights, Stigma, and Substance Use. Health Hum Rights. 2020; 22(1):51-60. PMC: 7348456. View

3.
Miczo N . Beyond the "fetishism of words": considerations on the use of the interview to gather chronic illness narratives. Qual Health Res. 2003; 13(4):469-90. DOI: 10.1177/1049732302250756. View

4.
Khalil K, Das P, Kammowanee R, Saluja D, Mitra P, Das S . Ethical considerations of phone-based interviews from three studies of COVID-19 impact in Bihar, India. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(Suppl 5). PMC: 8375446. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005981. View

5.
GOFFMAN E . On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry. 1955; 18(3):213-31. DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008. View