» Articles » PMID: 36282421

A Retrospective Review of a Large Series of Groin Hernia Patients Operated with Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Technique (R-TAPP)

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Oct 25
PMID 36282421
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have reviewed the patient outcome and the feasibility of robotically assisted inguinal hernia repair (R-TAPP) from the first 4-years period after its introduction in our department in a Scandinavian Public Health hospital. A total of 226 hernia repairs were performed in 195 patients (31 bilateral hernias). 160 patients had primary hernias, whereas 35 had recurrent hernias. Of the recurrent hernias, three had recurred twice. The majority of the hernias were in the right groin (53.3%) and the lateral location was the most common (65.0%). The hernia was scrotal in 29 cases. The mean operation time was significantly reduced throughout the observation period for our cohort, i.e. from 81 to 57 min (p < 0.001). The operation time was 27 min faster (mean value) in unilateral vs bilateral hernias and 19 min faster (mean value) in primary vs residual hernias. There were no statistically significant differences in operation time between lateral and medial hernias, and no differences in operation time between the obese and normal-weight cases. We experienced four severe per-operative complications (4/226; 1.8%): two cases of abdominal wall bleeding subsequently undergoing intravascular coiling, one perforation of the urinary bladder and one perforation of small bowel that were both closed by direct suture intraoperatively. There were no conversions to laparoscopy or open procedure. One hernia recurred during the observation period. Our findings suggest that the R-TAPP procedure in a Scandinavian Public Health hospital's surgical department is both safe and feasible.

Citing Articles

Is There a Place for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Realm of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Narrative Review.

Ungureanu C, Stanculea F, Ginghina O, Ene C, Iordache N Maedica (Bucur). 2024; 19(3):607-613.

PMID: 39553369 PMC: 11565137. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.3.607.


Robotic Assisted Hernia Repair in Four Nordic Countries  - Status and Challenges.

Helgstrand F, Rietz G, Tornqvist B, Lambrecht J, Gaupset R, Rautio T J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024; 3:13224.

PMID: 38993476 PMC: 11236569. DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13224.


Massive inguinal herniation of the bladder with bilateral hydronephrosis, complicated by psychosis.

Kinnear N, Hennessey D BMJ Case Rep. 2023; 16(7).

PMID: 37433687 PMC: 10347516. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256040.

References
1.
Arcerito M, Changchien E, Bernal O, Konkoly-Thege A, Moon J . Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Technique and Early Experience. Am Surg. 2016; 82(10):1014-1017. View

2.
Kudsi O, Bou-Ayash N, Gokcal F . Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis. Hernia. 2021; 26(4):1033-1039. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02433-5. View

3.
Proietti F, La Regina D, Pini R, Di Giuseppe M, Cianfarani A, Mongelli F . Learning curve of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc. 2020; 35(12):6643-6649. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08165-4. View

4.
Muysoms F, Van Cleven S, Kyle-Leinhase I, Ballecer C, Ramaswamy A . Robotic-assisted laparoscopic groin hernia repair: observational case-control study on the operative time during the learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32(12):4850-4859. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6236-7. View

5.
Sheetz K, Claflin J, Dimick J . Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(1):e1918911. PMC: 6991252. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911. View