» Articles » PMID: 36277598

Time to Publication for Orthopaedic Surgery Peer-reviewed Journals: A Cross-sectional Bibliometric Analysis

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Oct 24
PMID 36277598
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The dissemination of research and evidence-based medicine is critical to advancing science and improving clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the timing and associated factors of the publication process for the most influential orthopaedic surgery research journals.

Methods: After analyzing 25 orthopaedic surgery journals with the highest impact factors, 14 journals provided the necessary information for data analysis. A minimum of three consecutive issues per journal from 2021 were collected for review. Within each issue, all articles were included except for reviews, commentaries, replies, letters to the editor, and invited articles. The publication times for received to accepted (RA), received to published in press (RP1), and received to published in print (RP2) were retrieved and compared. Journal impact factor, specialty, and article level of evidence were recorded.

Results: A total of 1040 articles were included with a mean number of 74.3 ± 38 (range, 35-182) articles analyzed per journal. The mean impact factor for the 14 journals was 3.6 ± 1 (range, 2.5-5.8). The overall median duration of time for RA, RP1, and RP2 were 119 (IQR, 78-165) days, 157 (IQR, 102-216) days, and 291 (IQR, 243-378) days across all 14 journals, respectively. demonstrated the shortest median duration of time for RA and RP1, while demonstrated the shortest median duration of time for RP2. demonstrated the longest median duration of time for RA and RP2, while the demonstrated the longest median duration of time for RP1. Level three studies, which included retrospective case-control and cohort study designs, demonstrated the shortest publication times, while sports medicine journals demonstrated the longest publication times for all periods.

Conclusion: There was substantial variation in publication times across orthopaedic surgery journals which may impact accessibility to clinical insights.

Citing Articles

Factors for predicting time to acceptance in the journal of the American academy of orthopaedic surgeons.

Crawford E, Gergoudis M, Whitaker S, Laubach L, Yeramosu T, Patel N Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025; 35(1):81.

PMID: 40016586 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-025-04178-8.


Publishing during a Pandemic: Analyzing Recent Publication Times in Hand Surgery.

Braswell A, Wilson A, Willhelm G, Morsy M, Aliotta R Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(11):e6303.

PMID: 39534375 PMC: 11556949. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006303.


Orthopaedic Surgeons Should Consider Online and E-publication Resources for the Most Current Evidence-Based Medicine Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Fasulo S, De Wilde K, Kalahasti K, Dhillon J, Mulcahey M, Scillia A Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023; 5(4):100765.

PMID: 37520502 PMC: 10382884. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100765.

References
1.
Baldwin C, Chandran L, Gusic M . Guidelines for evaluating the educational performance of medical school faculty: priming a national conversation. Teach Learn Med. 2011; 23(3):285-97. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2011.586936. View

2.
Ence A, Cope S, Holliday E, Somerson J . Publication Productivity and Experience: Factors Associated with Academic Rank Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(10):e41. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00757. View

3.
Westfall J, Mold J, Fagnan L . Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007; 297(4):403-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.4.403. View

4.
Bastian S, Ippolito J, Lopez S, Eloy J, Beebe K . The Use of the h-Index in Academic Orthopaedic Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(4):e14. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01354. View

5.
McKee R, Whelan D, Schemitsch E, McKee M . Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(8):675-84. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01364. View