» Articles » PMID: 36276156

Novel Serum Proteomic Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis and Aggressive Grade Identification of Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Oct 24
PMID 36276156
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common tumors and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. The discovery of novel biomarkers for PCa diagnosis in the early stage, as well as discriminating aggressive PCa from non-aggressive PCa continue to pose a challenge. The aim of this study was to identify serum proteins that were sensitive and specific enough to detect early-stage and aggressive PCa.

Methods: The serum proteomic profiling of patients with PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was comprehensively analyzed using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS), and the bioinformatics analysis was performed. The differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) of interest were further verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoturbidimetry assay.

Results: Statistically significant difference in abundance showed 56 DEPs between early-stage PCa and BPH and 47 DEPs between aggressive and non-aggressive PCa patients. In addition, the verification results showed that serum L-selectin concentration was significantly higher (<0.05) in Gleason 6 PCa when compared with BPH, and the concentration of osteopontin (SPP1) and ceruloplasmin (CP) increased with higher Gleason score.

Conclusions: DIA-MS has great potential in cancer-related biomarker screening. Our data demonstrated that adding SPP1 and CP to PSA improved the separation of Gleason 7 (4 + 3) or above from Gleason 7 (3 + 4) or below compared with PSA diagnosis alone. Serum SPP1 and CP could be effective biomarkers to differentiate aggressive PCa (especially Gleason 7 (4 + 3) or above) from non-aggressive disease.

Citing Articles

Plasma biomarkers in patients with age-related sarcopenia: a proteomic exploration and experimental validation.

Lin Q, Li K, Li L, Guan L, Zeng Y, Cai D Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024; 37(1):13.

PMID: 39725826 PMC: 11671435. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-024-02903-7.


Advancements in Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: A Review.

Agbetuyi-Tayo P, Gbadebo M, Rotimi O, Rotimi S Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241290029.

PMID: 39440372 PMC: 11497500. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241290029.


A Scaled Proteomic Discovery Study for Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Markers Using Proteograph and Trapped Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry.

Chang M, Lange J, Cartier J, Moore T, Soriano S, Albracht B Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(15).

PMID: 39125581 PMC: 11311733. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158010.


Serum sSelectin-L is an early specific indicator of radiation injury.

Li S, Zhang W, Zhang H, Fan Y, Jia M, Qi Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e30527.

PMID: 38778981 PMC: 11109730. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30527.


The Potential of Extracellular Matrix- and Integrin Adhesion Complex-Related Molecules for Prostate Cancer Biomarker Discovery.

Samarzija I Biomedicines. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38255186 PMC: 10813710. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010079.


References
1.
Rauniyar N, Peng G, Lam T, Zhao H, Mor G, Williams K . Data-Independent Acquisition and Parallel Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry Identification of Serum Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer. Biomark Insights. 2017; 12:1177271917710948. PMC: 5462478. DOI: 10.1177/1177271917710948. View

2.
Balmana M, Sarrats A, Llop E, Barrabes S, Saldova R, Ferri M . Identification of potential pancreatic cancer serum markers: Increased sialyl-Lewis X on ceruloplasmin. Clin Chim Acta. 2015; 442:56-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.007. View

3.
Taylor K, Luta G, Miller A, Church T, Kelly S, Muenz L . Long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer survivors and noncancer controls in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(22):2768-75. PMC: 4166119. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.2767. View

4.
Zhu X, Gou X, Zhou M . Nomograms Predict Survival Advantages of Gleason Score 3+4 Over 4+3 for Prostate Cancer: A SEER-Based Study. Front Oncol. 2019; 9:646. PMC: 6646708. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00646. View

5.
van Leenders G, van der Kwast T, Grignon D, Evans A, Kristiansen G, Kweldam C . The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020; 44(8):e87-e99. PMC: 7382533. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001497. View