» Articles » PMID: 36276077

Impact of Cryopreservation on CAR T Production and Clinical Response

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Oct 24
PMID 36276077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has become an efficient treatment option for patients with hematological malignancies. FDA approved CAR T products are manufactured in centralized facilities from fresh or frozen leukapheresis and the cryopreserved CAR T infusion product is shipped back to the patient. An increasing number of clinical centers produce CAR T cells on-site, which enables the use of fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs and CAR T cells. Here we determined the effect of cryopreservation on PBMCs and CD19 CAR T cells in a cohort of 118 patients treated with fresh CAR T cells and in several patients head-to-head. Cryopreserved PBMCs, obtained from leukapheresis products, contained less erythrocytes and T cells, but were sufficient to produce CAR T cells for therapy. There was no correlation between the recovery of PBMCs and the transduction efficacy, the number of CAR T cells obtained by the end of the manufacturing process, the reactivity, or the response rate to CAR T therapy. We could show that CAR T cells cryopreserved during the manufacturing process, stored and resumed expansion at a later time point, yielded sufficient cell numbers for treatment and led to complete remissions. Phenotype analysis including T cell subtypes, chemokine receptor and co-inhibitory/stimulatory molecules, revealed that fresh CAR T cells expressed significantly more TIM-3 and contained less effector T cells in comparison to their frozen counterparts. In addition, fresh CAR T infusion products demonstrated increased anti-tumor reactivity, however cryopreserved CAR T cells still showed high anti-tumor potency and specificity. The recovery of cryopreserved CAR T cells was similar in responding and non-responding patients. Although fresh CAR T infusion products exhibit higher anti-tumor reactivity, the use of frozen PBMCs as staring material and frozen CAR T infusion products seems a viable option, as frozen products still exhibit high potency and cryopreservation did not seem to affect the clinical outcome.

Citing Articles

Point-of-care manufacturing of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells using a closed production platform: Experiences of an academic in Thailand.

Luanpitpong S, Klaihmon P, Janan M, Kungwankiattichai S, Owattanapanich W, Kunacheewa C Mol Ther Oncol. 2024; 32(4):200889.

PMID: 39507317 PMC: 11539415. DOI: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200889.


Advances in manufacturing chimeric antigen receptor immune cell therapies.

Ramamurthy A, Tommasi A, Saha K Semin Immunopathol. 2024; 46(5):12.

PMID: 39150566 DOI: 10.1007/s00281-024-01019-4.


Infusion and delivery strategies to maximize the efficacy of CAR-T cell immunotherapy for cancers.

Gu X, Zhang Y, Zhou W, Wang F, Yan F, Gao H Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024; 13(1):70.

PMID: 39061100 PMC: 11282638. DOI: 10.1186/s40164-024-00542-2.


[Retrospective clinical study on cryopreservation-free integrated autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation model for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma].

Yang X, Li C, Chen J, Che F, Xiao R, Li H Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024; 45(5):488-494.

PMID: 38964924 PMC: 11270491. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20230929-00152.


CAR-T Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Testa U, Pelosi E, Castelli G, Fresa A, Laurenti L Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2024; 16(1):e2024045.

PMID: 38882451 PMC: 11178044. DOI: 10.4084/MJHID.2024.045.


References
1.
Maude S, Laetsch T, Buechner J, Rives S, Boyer M, Bittencourt H . Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(5):439-448. PMC: 5996391. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709866. View

2.
Danylesko I, Chowers G, Shouval R, Besser M, Jacoby E, Shimoni A . Treatment with anti CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells after antibody-based immunotherapy in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Res Transl Med. 2019; 68(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.retram.2019.12.001. View

3.
Liu H, Pan C, Song W, Liu D, Li Z, Zheng L . Novel strategies for immuno-oncology breakthroughs with cell therapy. Biomark Res. 2021; 9(1):62. PMC: 8325826. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-021-00316-6. View

4.
Avery L, Filderman J, Szymczak-Workman A, Kane L . Tim-3 co-stimulation promotes short-lived effector T cells, restricts memory precursors, and is dispensable for T cell exhaustion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(10):2455-2460. PMC: 5877951. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712107115. View

5.
Jain T, Bar M, Kansagra A, Chong E, Hashmi S, Neelapu S . Use of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Clinical Practice for Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019; 25(12):2305-2321. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.08.015. View