» Articles » PMID: 36275004

A Transfer Learning Approach Based on Gradient Boosting Machine for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2022 Oct 24
PMID 36275004
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) during the Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) stage could enable effective intervention to slow down disease progression. Computer-aided diagnosis of AD relies on a sufficient amount of biomarker data. When this requirement is not fulfilled, transfer learning can be used to transfer knowledge from a source domain with more amount of labeled data than available in the desired target domain. In this study, an instance-based transfer learning framework is presented based on the gradient boosting machine (GBM). In GBM, a sequence of base learners is built, and each learner focuses on the errors (residuals) of the previous learner. In our transfer learning version of GBM (TrGB), a weighting mechanism based on the residuals of the base learners is defined for the source instances. Consequently, instances with different distribution than the target data will have a lower impact on the target learner. The proposed weighting scheme aims to transfer as much information as possible from the source domain while avoiding negative transfer. The target data in this study was obtained from the Mount Sinai dataset which is collected and processed in a collaborative 5-year project at the Mount Sinai Medical Center. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset was used as the source domain. The experimental results showed that the proposed TrGB algorithm could improve the classification accuracy by 1.5 and 4.5% for CN vs. MCI and multiclass classification, respectively, as compared to the conventional methods. Also, using the TrGB model and transferred knowledge from the CN vs. AD classification of the source domain, the average score of early MCI vs. late MCI classification improved by 5%.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning Driven by Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Classification of Alzheimer Disease Progression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Battineni G, Chintalapudi N, Amenta F JMIR Aging. 2024; 7():e59370.

PMID: 39714089 PMC: 11704653. DOI: 10.2196/59370.


Identification of a prognostic evaluator from glutamine metabolic heterogeneity studies within and between tissues in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Bao J, Yu Y Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1241677.

PMID: 37954858 PMC: 10637396. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1241677.


Development and validation of a risk prediction model for cage subsidence after instrumented posterior lumbar fusion based on machine learning: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Xiong T, Wang B, Qin W, Yang L, Ou Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1196384.

PMID: 37547617 PMC: 10401589. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1196384.

References
1.
Mehmood A, Yang S, Feng Z, Wang M, Ahmad A, Khan R . A Transfer Learning Approach for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease on MRI Images. Neuroscience. 2021; 460:43-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.01.002. View

2.
Barnes D, Yaffe K . The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer's disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10(9):819-28. PMC: 3647614. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70072-2. View

3.
Maqsood M, Nazir F, Khan U, Aadil F, Jamal H, Mehmood I . Transfer Learning Assisted Classification and Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Stages Using 3D MRI Scans. Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(11). PMC: 6603745. DOI: 10.3390/s19112645. View

4.
Zhang Q, Li H, Zhang Y, Li M . Instance transfer learning with multisource dynamic TrAdaBoost. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014; 2014:282747. PMC: 4135147. DOI: 10.1155/2014/282747. View

5.
Lee S, Xu Z, Li T, Yang Y . A novel bagging C4.5 algorithm based on wrapper feature selection for supporting wise clinical decision making. J Biomed Inform. 2017; 78:144-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.11.005. View