» Articles » PMID: 36274920

Educational Quality of YouTube Cholesteatoma Surgery Videos: Areas for Improvement

Overview
Journal OTO Open
Date 2022 Oct 24
PMID 36274920
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Otolaryngology surgical education continues to evolve where trainees increasingly use videos to learn technical skills. Trainees commonly use YouTube, but no study to date has evaluated the educational quality (EQ) of otologic surgical videos on YouTube. We aim to assess the EQ of cholesteatoma surgical videos. Cholesteatoma surgical videos were queried using YouTube search terms, assessed using LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS), a validated assessment tool for publication, and categorized into low (0-6), medium (7-12), and high (13-18) EQ groups. In total, 74 videos were identified (mean LAP-VEGaS score = 9.6 ± 4.0) and 44.6% had medium EQ. Videos commonly lacked graphic aids to highlight anatomy (71.6%) and postprocedural outcomes (68.9%). LAP-VEGaS scores were greater in videos originating from US surgeons compared to non-US surgeons (12.4 ± 3.4 vs 8.0 ± 3.5; < .001). Our study highlights that otolaryngology trainees may experience difficulty finding high-EQ cholesteatoma surgery videos on YouTube. Areas for improved EQ content are discussed. : IV.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the quality and reliability of youtube videos on tympanostomy tubes: a comprehensive analysis for patients and parents.

Ugurlu G, Ugurlu B BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):776.

PMID: 40001067 PMC: 11863889. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21963-6.


Assessing Laryngectomy Patient Education on YouTube: Investigating Quality and Reliability.

Lin M, Ayo-Ajibola O, Castellanos C, West J, Luu N, Kim I OTO Open. 2024; 8(1):e113.

PMID: 38299048 PMC: 10828916. DOI: 10.1002/oto2.113.


Evaluation of the educational quality of publicly available online videos on laparoscopic jejunostomy by utilizing the LAP-VEGaS guidelines.

Roberson J, Rouhi A, Bader A, Yi W, Williams N, Morris J Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(8):6565-6568.

PMID: 37308765 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10165-z.

References
1.
Luu N, Yver C, Douglas J, Tasche K, Thakkar P, Rajasekaran K . Assessment of YouTube as an Educational Tool in Teaching Key Indicator Cases in Otolaryngology During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Neck Dissection. J Surg Educ. 2020; 78(1):214-231. PMC: 7338020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.019. View

2.
Rapp A, Healy M, Charlton M, Keith J, Rosenbaum M, Kapadia M . YouTube is the Most Frequently Used Educational Video Source for Surgical Preparation. J Surg Educ. 2016; 73(6):1072-1076. PMC: 7263439. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.024. View

3.
Ward T, Fer D, Ban Y, Rosman G, Meireles O, Hashimoto D . Challenges in surgical video annotation. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2021; 26(1):58-68. DOI: 10.1080/24699322.2021.1937320. View

4.
Shires C, Wilson C, Sebelik M . Thyroid surgery YouTube videos: estimating quality by surgeon characteristics and view rate. Gland Surg. 2019; 8(3):207-211. PMC: 6606480. DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.10.01. View

5.
Shrout P, Fleiss J . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86(2):420-8. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420. View