» Articles » PMID: 36269364

Augmented Reality During Parotid Surgery: Real-life Evaluation of Voice Control of a Head Mounted Display

Overview
Date 2022 Oct 21
PMID 36269364
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Augmented Reality can improve surgical planning and performance in parotid surgery. For easier application we implemented a voice control manual for our augmented reality system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of the voice control in real-life situations.

Methods: We used the HoloLens 1 (Microsoft Corporation) with a special speech recognition software for parotid surgery. The evaluation took place in a audiometry cubicle and during real surgical procedures. Voice commands were used to display various 3D structures of the patient with the HoloLens 1. Commands had different variations (male/female, 65 dB SPL)/louder, various structures).

Results: In silence, 100% of commands were recognized. If the volume of the operation room (OR) background noise exceeds 42 dB, the recognition rate decreases significantly, and it drops below 40% at > 60 dB SPL. With constant speech volume at 65 dB SPL male speakers had a significant better recognition rate than female speakers (p = 0.046). Higher speech volumes can compensate this effect. The recognition rate depends on the type of background noise. Mixed OR noise (52 dB(A)) reduced the detection rate significantly compared to single suction noise at 52 dB(A) (p ≤ 0.00001). The recognition rate was significantly better in the OR than in the audio cubicle (p = 0.00013 both genders, 0.0086 female, and 0.0036 male).

Conclusions: The recognition rate of voice commands can be enhanced by increasing the speech volume and by singularizing ambient noises. The detection rate depends on the loudness of the OR noise. Male voices are understood significantly better than female voices.

Citing Articles

Point Cloud Registration for Measuring Shape Dependence of Soft Tissue Deformation by Digital Twins in Head and Neck Surgery.

Monji-Azad S, Mannle D, Hesser J, Pohlmann J, Rotter N, Affolter A Biomed Hub. 2024; 9(1):9-15.

PMID: 38322041 PMC: 10845096. DOI: 10.1159/000535421.


Artificial intelligence directed development of a digital twin to measure soft tissue shift during head and neck surgery.

Mannle D, Pohlmann J, Monji-Azad S, Hesser J, Rotter N, Affolter A PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0287081.

PMID: 37556451 PMC: 10411805. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287081.

References
1.
El Shallaly G, Cuschieri A . Optimum view distance for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(12):1879-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0162-1. View

2.
Levy M, Chen J, Moffitt K, Corber Z, McComb J . Stereoscopic head-mounted display incorporated into microsurgical procedures: technical note. Neurosurgery. 1998; 43(2):392-5; discussion 395-6. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199808000-00141. View

3.
Dennler C, Bauer D, Scheibler A, Spirig J, Gotschi T, Furnstahl P . Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):451. PMC: 8132365. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w. View

4.
Morales Mojica C, Velazco-Garcia J, Pappas E, Birbilis T, Becker A, Leiss E . A Holographic Augmented Reality Interface for Visualizing of MRI Data and Planning of Neurosurgical Procedures. J Digit Imaging. 2021; 34(4):1014-1025. PMC: 8455790. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00412-3. View

5.
Scherl C, Stratemeier J, Karle C, Rotter N, Hesser J, Huber L . Augmented reality with HoloLens in parotid surgery: how to assess and to improve accuracy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 278(7):2473-2483. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06351-7. View