» Articles » PMID: 36268072

Improving Feature Extraction from Histopathological Images Through a Fine-tuning ImageNet Model

Overview
Journal J Pathol Inform
Date 2022 Oct 21
PMID 36268072
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Due to lack of annotated pathological images, transfer learning has been the predominant approach in the field of digital pathology. Pre-trained neural networks based on ImageNet database are often used to extract "off-the-shelf" features, achieving great success in predicting tissue types, molecular features, and clinical outcomes, etc. We hypothesize that fine-tuning the pre-trained models using histopathological images could further improve feature extraction, and downstream prediction performance.

Methods: We used 100 000 annotated H&E image patches for colorectal cancer (CRC) to fine-tune a pre-trained Xception model via a 2-step approach. The features extracted from fine-tuned Xception (FTX-2048) model and Image-pretrained (IMGNET-2048) model were compared through: (1) tissue classification for H&E images from CRC, same image type that was used for fine-tuning; (2) prediction of immune-related gene expression, and (3) gene mutations for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Five-fold cross validation was used for model performance evaluation. Each experiment was repeated 50 times.

Findings: The extracted features from the fine-tuned FTX-2048 exhibited significantly higher accuracy (98.4%) for predicting tissue types of CRC compared to the "off-the-shelf" features directly from Xception based on ImageNet database (96.4%) (P value = 2.2 × 10). Particularly, FTX-2048 markedly improved the accuracy for stroma from 87% to 94%. Similarly, features from FTX-2048 boosted the prediction of transcriptomic expression of immune-related genes in LUAD. For the genes that had significant relationships with image features (P < 0.05, n = 171), the features from the fine-tuned model improved the prediction for the majority of the genes (139; 81%). In addition, features from FTX-2048 improved prediction of mutation for 5 out of 9 most frequently mutated genes (STK11, TP53, LRP1B, NF1, and FAT1) in LUAD.

Conclusions: We proved the concept that fine-tuning the pretrained ImageNet neural networks with histopathology images can produce higher quality features and better prediction performance for not only the same-cancer tissue classification where similar images from the same cancer are used for fine-tuning, but also cross-cancer prediction for gene expression and mutation at patient level.

Citing Articles

WDRIV-Net: a weighted ensemble transfer learning to improve automatic type stratification of lumbar intervertebral disc bulge, prolapse, and herniation.

Nakamoto I, Chen H, Wang R, Guo Y, Chen W, Feng J Biomed Eng Online. 2025; 24(1):11.

PMID: 39915867 PMC: 11800529. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-025-01341-4.


Precise grading of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with multi-scale pyramidal CNN.

Shalata A, Alksas A, Shehata M, Khater S, Ezzat O, Ali K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25131.

PMID: 39448755 PMC: 11502747. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77101-6.


Deep Learning in Hematology: From Molecules to Patients.

Wang J Clin Hematol Int. 2024; 6(4):19-42.

PMID: 39417017 PMC: 11477942. DOI: 10.46989/001c.124131.


Transfer Learning in Cancer Genetics, Mutation Detection, Gene Expression Analysis, and Syndrome Recognition.

Ashayeri H, Sobhi N, Plawiak P, Pedrammehr S, Alizadehsani R, Jafarizadeh A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893257 PMC: 11171544. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112138.


Tissue classification and diagnosis of colorectal cancer histopathology images using deep learning algorithms. Is the time ripe for clinical practice implementation?.

Chlorogiannis D, Verras G, Tzelepi V, Chlorogiannis A, Apostolos A, Kotis K Prz Gastroenterol. 2024; 18(4):353-367.

PMID: 38572457 PMC: 10985751. DOI: 10.5114/pg.2023.130337.


References
1.
Sirinukunwattana K, Domingo E, Richman S, Redmond K, Blake A, Verrill C . Image-based consensus molecular subtype (imCMS) classification of colorectal cancer using deep learning. Gut. 2020; 70(3):544-554. PMC: 7873419. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319866. View

2.
Skrede O, de Raedt S, Kleppe A, Hveem T, Liestol K, Maddison J . Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10221):350-360. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32998-8. View

3.
Bera K, Schalper K, Rimm D, Velcheti V, Madabhushi A . Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019; 16(11):703-715. PMC: 6880861. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y. View

4.
Chang P, Grinband J, Weinberg B, Bardis M, Khy M, Cadena G . Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Accurately Classify Genetic Mutations in Gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018; 39(7):1201-1207. PMC: 6880932. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5667. View

5.
Riasatian A, Babaie M, Maleki D, Kalra S, Valipour M, Hemati S . Fine-Tuning and training of densenet for histopathology image representation using TCGA diagnostic slides. Med Image Anal. 2021; 70:102032. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102032. View