» Articles » PMID: 36267629

Novel Use of a Virtual Driving Assessment to Classify Driver Skill at the Time of Licensure

Abstract

Motor vehicle crash rates are highest immediately after licensure, and driver error is one of the leading causes. Yet, few studies have quantified driving skills at the time of licensure, making it difficult to identify at-risk drivers independent driving. Using data from a virtual driving assessment implemented into the licensing workflow in Ohio, this study presents the first population-level study classifying degree of skill at the time of licensure and validating these against a measure of on-road performance: license exam outcomes. Principal component and cluster analysis of 33,249 virtual driving assessments identified 20 Skill Clusters that were then grouped into 4 major summary "Driving Classes"; i (i.e. careful and skilled drivers) (i.e. an average new driver with minor vehicle control skill deficits) (i.e. drivers with more control issues and who take more risks); and iv) i.e. drivers with even more control issues and more reckless and risk-taking behavior). Category labels were determined based on patterns of VDA skill deficits alone (i.e. agnostic of the license examination outcome). These Skill Clusters and Driving Classes had different distributions by sex and age, reflecting age-related licensing policies (i.e. those under 18 and subject to GDL and driver education and training), and were differentially associated with subsequent performance on the on-road licensing examination (showing criterion validity). The and classes had lower than average odds of failing, and the other two more problematic Driving Classes had higher odds of failing. Thus, this study showed that license applicants can be classified based on their driving skills at the time of licensure. Future studies will validate these Skill Cluster classes in relation to their prediction of post-licensure crash outcomes.

Citing Articles

Neuromodulation on the ground and in the clouds: a mini review of transcranial direct current stimulation for altering performance in interactive driving and flight simulators.

Sansevere K, Ward N Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1479887.

PMID: 39669679 PMC: 11634617. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1479887.

References
1.
Swedler D, Bowman S, Baker S . Gender and Age Differences among Teen Drivers in Fatal Crashes. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012; 56:97-106. PMC: 3503410. View

2.
Curry A, Pfeiffer M, Durbin D, Elliott M . Young driver crash rates by licensing age, driving experience, and license phase. Accid Anal Prev. 2015; 80:243-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.019. View

3.
Curry A, Hafetz J, Kallan M, Winston F, Durbin D . Prevalence of teen driver errors leading to serious motor vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2011; 43(4):1285-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.019. View

4.
Vogel K . A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accid Anal Prev. 2003; 35(3):427-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00022-2. View

5.
Curry A, Metzger K, Williams A, Tefft B . Comparison of older and younger novice driver crash rates: Informing the need for extended Graduated Driver Licensing restrictions. Accid Anal Prev. 2017; 108:66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.015. View