» Articles » PMID: 36256959

Clinical Consensus Statement: Vaginal Energy-Based Devices

Overview
Date 2022 Oct 18
PMID 36256959
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This clinical consensus statement on vaginal energy-based devices (EBDs) reflects an update by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society's EBD writing group. In 2019, the American Urogynecologic Society's EBD writing group used a modified Delphi process to assess statements that were evaluated for consensus after a structured literature search. A total of 40 statements were assessed and divided into 5 categories: (1) patient criteria, (2) health care provider criteria, (3) efficacy, (4) safety, and (5) treatment considerations. Of the 40 statements that were assessed, 28 reached consensus and the remaining 12 did not. Lack of evidence was among the main reasons that vulvovaginal EBD treatment statements did not reach consensus. In March 2022, these statements were reassessed using the interim literature.

Citing Articles

CO laser therapy for management of stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hafidh B, Baradwan S, Latifah H, Gari A, Sabban H, Abduljabbar H Ther Adv Urol. 2023; 15:17562872231210216.

PMID: 37953973 PMC: 10638870. DOI: 10.1177/17562872231210216.


Is Erbium/Neodymium Laser Combination Therapy an Effective Treatment Option for Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome With Vulvodynia?.

Okui N, Okui M, Gambacciani M Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31228.

PMID: 36505169 PMC: 9730432. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31228.