» Articles » PMID: 36254650

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Head and Neck Cancer: a Matched-pair Analysis

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to describe the prospective implementation of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol in an Italian tertiary academic centre.

Methods: Adult patients receiving surgery for primary or recurrent clinical stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were enrolled. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of the ERAS protocol on length of hospital stay (LOS). The secondary objective was to assess its impact on complications. To evaluate the results of the ERAS protocol, a matched-pair analysis was conducted, comparing ERAS patients with comparable cases treated before 2018.

Results: Forty ERAS and 40 non-ERAS patients were analysed. There were no significant differences between the cohorts regarding age, gender, stage of disease, comorbidity, ASA score, and duration of surgery. A significantly shorter LOS for the ERAS group (median, 14 days; range, 10-19) than for non-ERAS patients (median, 17.5 days; range, 13-21) was observed (p = 0.0128). The incidence of complications was not significantly different (p = 0.140).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the introduction of an ERAS protocol in the daily practice is feasible, and can result in significant reduction in LOS.

Citing Articles

Assessing Donor Site Morbidity and Impact on Quality of Life in Free Flap Microsurgery: An Overview.

Hodea F, Hariga C, Bordeanu-Diaconescu E, Cretu A, Dumitru C, Ratoiu V Life (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39859976 PMC: 11766666. DOI: 10.3390/life15010036.


Patient management with Head and Neck tumors-A nationwide data collection in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Pabst A, Zeller A, Goetze E, Holzle F, Hoffmann J, Raguse J Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(9):469.

PMID: 39105887 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05859-0.

References
1.
Helman S, Brant J, Moubayed S, Newman J, Cannady S, Chai R . Predictors of length of stay, reoperation, and readmission following total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2016; 127(6):1339-1344. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26454. View

2.
Mays A, Moustafa F, Worley M, Waltonen J, DAgostino Jr R . A model for predicting gastrostomy tube placement in patients undergoing surgery for upper aerodigestive tract lesions. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 140(12):1198-206. PMC: 4321944. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2360. View

3.
Gourin C, Couch M, Johnson J . Effect of weight loss on short-term outcomes and costs of care after head and neck cancer surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014; 123(2):101-10. DOI: 10.1177/0003489414523564. View

4.
Dort J, Farwell D, Findlay M, Huber G, Kerr P, Shea-Budgell M . Optimal Perioperative Care in Major Head and Neck Cancer Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction: A Consensus Review and Recommendations From the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 143(3):292-303. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2981. View

5.
McDevitt J, de Camargo Cancela M, Kelly M, Comber H, Sharp L . Tracheostomy and infection prolong length of stay in hospital after surgery for head and neck cancer: a population based study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015; 121(1):22-28.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.08.004. View