The Political System Through a Partisan Lens: Within-person Changes in Support for Political Parties Precede Political System Attitudes

Overview

Journal Br J Soc Psychol

Specialty Psychology

Date 2022 Oct 17

PMID 36251586

Authors

Nicole Satherley

Danny Osborne

Chris G Sibley

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although political party support and attitudes towards the political system are closely related, the temporal ordering of these associations is unclear. Indeed, prior research identifies both partisan-led change in system attitudes and system attitude-led change in party support. Using a ten-year (2010-2020) national probability sample of New Zealand adults (N = 66,359), we test these associations by modelling the within-person cross-lagged effects between conservative and liberal party support, and political system justification. During conservative-led governments, increases in conservative party support predicted increases in political system justification more strongly than vice versa. The 2017 shift to a liberal-led government was met with an immediate reversal of the effects of party support on system justification, but the effect of system justification on party support took a full year to reverse. These results demonstrate people's perceptions of the fairness of the political system depend on their support for the party in power.

Citing Articles

The political system through a partisan lens: Within-person changes in support for political parties precede political system attitudes.

Satherley N, Osborne D, Sibley C Br J Soc Psychol. 2022; 62(1):72-83.

PMID: 36251586 PMC: 10091949. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12585.

References

Satherley N, Osborne D, Sibley C . The political system through a partisan lens: Within-person changes in support for political parties precede political system attitudes. Br J Soc Psychol. 2022; 62(1):72-83. PMC: 10091949. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12585. View

Kay A, Jost J . Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(5):823-37. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823. View

Osborne D, Sengupta N, Sibley C . System justification theory at 25: Evaluating a paradigm shift in psychology and looking towards the future. Br J Soc Psychol. 2018; . DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12302. View

Laurin K . Inaugurating Rationalization: Three Field Studies Find Increased Rationalization When Anticipated Realities Become Current. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(4):483-495. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617738814. View

Satherley N, Yogeeswaran K, Osborne D, Sibley C . If They Say "Yes," We Say "No": Partisan Cues Increase Polarization Over National Symbols. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(12):1996-2009. DOI: 10.1177/0956797618805420. View

Chanley V, Rudolph T, Rahn W . The origins and consequences of public trust in government: a time series analysis. Public Opin Q. 2000; 64(3):239-56. DOI: 10.1086/317987. View

Cohen G . Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(5):808-22. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808. View

Satherley N, Sibley C, Osborne D . Ideology before party: Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism temporally precede political party support. Br J Soc Psychol. 2020; 60(2):509-523. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12414. View

Laurin K, Shepherd S, Kay A . Restricted emigration, system inescapability, and defense of the status quo: system-justifying consequences of restricted exit opportunities. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(8):1075-82. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610375448. View

10.

Theiss-Morse E, Barton D, Wagner M . Political Trust in Polarized Times. Nebr Symp Motiv. 2015; 62:167-90. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_8. View

11.

Krupenkin M . Does Partisanship Affect Compliance with Government Recommendations?. Polit Behav. 2020; 43(1):451-472. PMC: 7224154. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-020-09613-6. View

12.

Clayton K, Davis N, Nyhan B, Porter E, Ryan T, Wood T . Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(23). PMC: 8201918. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024125118. View

13.

Hamaker E, Kuiper R, Grasman R . A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychol Methods. 2015; 20(1):102-16. DOI: 10.1037/a0038889. View