A Clinical Comparison Between Single-Space Technique and Double-Space Technique for Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia

Overview

Journal Anesth Essays Res

Specialty Anesthesiology

Date 2022 Oct 17

PMID 36249131

Authors

Pyarejan Basheer

G C Brijesh

Raman Kumar

Shailesh Kumar

Priyesh Kumar

Jay Prakash

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is commonly performed by double space technique (DST) and single space segment technique (SST) or needle-through-needle technique (NNT).

Aims And Objectives: We designed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on time required by the procedure, the number of attempts, and a level of sensory, side effects and cost-effectiveness.

Materials And Methods: Patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, = 30) or the single-space technique (single group, = 30). In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3-4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique. In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1-2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace.

Results: The single space (needle-through-needle) technique for CSE takes less time, less number of spinal punctures. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects. Sensory level at T10 on 5 min in group I was 90% and group II was 100% whereas at T8 it was 10% in group I; sensory level at T10, T8 and T6 on 10 min. in group I were 53.3%, 43.3% and 3.3% respectively whereas in group II were 80%, 16.7% and 3.3% respectively; sensory level at T10, T8, T6 and T4 on 15 min. in group I were 6.7%, 43.3%, 50% and 0% respectively whereas in group II were 23.3%, 50%, 23.3% and 3.3% respectively; and sensory level at T4, T6 and T8 on 20 min. in group I were 0%, 73.3% and 26.7% respectively whereas in group II were 16.7%, 33.3% and 50% respectively.

Conclusions: Single-space (needle-through-needle) CSEA takes less time, less number of spinal punctures and results in improved patient satisfaction. There were no differences in intraoperative variables between the DST and SST for CSEA.

References

Bernards C, Kopacz D, Michel M . Effect of needle puncture on morphine and lidocaine flux through the spinal meninges of the monkey in vitro. Implications for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1994; 80(4):853-8. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199404000-00019. View

Agarwal A, Kishore K . Complications and controversies of regional anaesthesia: a review. Indian J Anaesth. 2010; 53(5):543-53. PMC: 2900086. View

Puolakka R, Pitkanen M, Rosenberg P . Comparison of technical and block characteristics of different combined spinal and epidural anesthesia techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001; 26(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2001.19413. View

Morgan B, Kadim M . Mobile regional analgesia in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101(10):839-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13542.x. View

Cook T . Combined spinal-epidural techniques. Anaesthesia. 1999; 55(1):42-64. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01157.x. View

Cook T . 201 combined spinal-epidurals for anaesthesia using a separate needle technique. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004; 21(9):679-83. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021504009020. View

Casati A, DAmbrosio A, De Negri P, Fanelli G, Tagariello V, Tarantino F . A clinical comparison between needle-through-needle and double-segment techniques for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998; 23(4):390-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90013-x. View

Cascio M, Heath G . Meningitis following a combined spinal-epidural technique in a labouring term parturient. Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43(4):399-402. DOI: 10.1007/BF03011721. View

De Tommaso O, Caporuscio A, Tagariello V . Neurological complications following central neuraxial blocks: are there predictive factors?. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002; 19(10):705-16. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021502001163. View

10.

Birnbach D, Ojea L . Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) for labor and delivery. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2002; 40(4):27-48. DOI: 10.1097/00004311-200210000-00005. View

11.

Rawal N, Holmstrom B, Crowhurst J, van Zundert A . The combined spinal-epidural technique. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000; 18(2):267-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8537(05)70164-4. View

12.

Backe S, Sheikh Z, Wilson R, Lyons G . Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia: needle-through-needle or separate spaces?. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005; 21(11):854-7. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021504000171. View

13.

Buddeberg B, Bandschapp O, Girard T . Post-dural puncture headache. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019; 85(5):543-553. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.13331-1. View

14.

Ozkan D, Gonen E, Akkaya T, Bakir M . Popliteal block for lower limb surgery in children with cerebral palsy: effect on sevoflurane consumption and postoperative pain (a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial). J Anesth. 2017; 31(3):358-364. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-017-2318-2. View

15.

Xu H, Liu Y, Song W, Kan S, Liu F, Zhang D . Comparison of cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia regarding postdural puncture headache: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(14):e6527. PMC: 5411200. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006527. View

16.

Norris M, Grieco W, Borkowski M, Leighton B, Arkoosh V, Huffnagle H . Complications of labor analgesia: epidural versus combined spinal epidural techniques. Anesth Analg. 1994; 79(3):529-37. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199409000-00022. View

17.

Rawal N, van Zundert A, Holmstrom B, Crowhurst J . Combined spinal-epidural technique. Reg Anesth. 1997; 22(5):406-23. DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(97)80026-0. View

18.

Curelaru I . Long duration subarachnoid anaesthesia with continuous epidural block. Prakt Anaesth. 1979; 14(1):71-8. View

19.

Holmstrom B, Rawal N, Axelsson K, Nydahl P . Risk of catheter migration during combined spinal epidural block: percutaneous epiduroscopy study. Anesth Analg. 1995; 80(4):747-53. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199504000-00017. View

20.

Veena G, Pangotra A, Kumar S, Prakash J, Rao N, Priye S . Comparison of Perineural and Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A prospective Randomized Trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2021; 15(1):45-50. PMC: 8462415. DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_69_21. View