» Articles » PMID: 36248547

Exploring the Impact of Innovation Guidance on User Participation in Online Communities: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Cognitive and Affective Perspectives

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 Oct 17
PMID 36248547
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, many online communities have launched opinion-gathering activities to promote user participation in innovation and improve the quality of new products. The current methods for online innovation activities can be divided into two categories: cognitive guidance and affective guidance. However, the studies on online communities have mainly focused on user engagement motivations, and little attention has been paid to investigating the impact and underlying mechanism of innovation guidance on user participation at the linguistic level. This study first collected secondary data from NetEase.com and conducted an econometric model to explore the impact of cognitive guidance and affective guidance on users' participation in online innovation activities. Subsequently, we investigated the impact mechanism of different innovation guidance methods on user participation through two experiments, here by drawing on mental simulation theory. The experimental results showed that outcome simulation and process simulation imposed a dual mediating effect of innovation guidance on user participation. In addition, we also found that product types moderate the dual mediating effect of outcome simulation and process simulation. The findings can deepen and expand the research on user participation while providing practical implications for companies and platforms as they attempt to promote user participation in innovation activities.

Citing Articles

The influence of constellation virtual community atmosphere on blogger trust and constellation infatuation behavior.

Li Q, Li S, Li Q, Li Y BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):135.

PMID: 39966912 PMC: 11837644. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02468-8.


Continuous idea contribution in open innovation communities: The role of verbal persuasion from peers.

Zhang J, Qi G, Song C, Chen J Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1061415.

PMID: 36619137 PMC: 9815152. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061415.

References
1.
Haddock G, Maio G, Arnold K, Huskinson T . Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008; 34(6):769-78. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208314871. View

2.
Pennebaker J, Mehl M, Niederhoffer K . Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002; 54:547-77. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041. View

3.
Lin H . Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006; 9(5):540-7. DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.540. View

4.
Rubio N, Villasenor N, Yague M . Value Co-creation in Third-Party Managed Virtual Communities and Brand Equity. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:927. PMC: 7269091. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00927. View

5.
Mischel W, Shoda Y . A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychol Rev. 1995; 102(2):246-68. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246. View