» Articles » PMID: 36246854

Bias-corrected Estimators for Proportion of True Null Hypotheses: Application of Adaptive FDR-controlling in Segmented Failure Data

Overview
Journal J Appl Stat
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Oct 17
PMID 36246854
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two recently introduced model-based bias-corrected estimators for proportion of true null hypotheses ( ) under multiple hypotheses testing scenario have been restructured for random observations under a suitable failure model, available for each of the common hypotheses. Based on stochastic ordering, a new motivation behind formulation of some related estimators for is given. The reduction of bias for the model-based estimators are theoretically justified and algorithms for computing the estimators are also presented. The estimators are also used to formulate a popular adaptive multiple testing procedure. Extensive numerical study supports superiority of the bias-corrected estimators. The necessity of the proper distributional assumption for the failure data in the context of the model-based bias-corrected method has been highlighted. A case-study is done with a real-life dataset in connection with reliability and warranty studies to demonstrate the applicability of the procedure, under a non-Gaussian setup. The results obtained are in line with the intuition and experience of the subject expert. An intriguing discussion has been attempted to conclude the article that also indicates the future scope of study.

References
1.
Chen J, Wang S, Tsai C, Lin C . Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis. Pharmacogenomics J. 2006; 7(3):212-20. DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500412. View

2.
Wang H, Tuominen L, Tsai C . SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures. Bioinformatics. 2010; 27(2):225-31. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq650. View

3.
Hung H, ONeill R, Bauer P, KOHNE K . The behavior of the P-value when the alternative hypothesis is true. Biometrics. 1997; 53(1):11-22. View

4.
Cheng Y, Gao D, Tong T . Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses. Biostatistics. 2014; 16(1):189-204. PMC: 4263223. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu029. View

5.
Tong T, Feng Z, Hilton J, Zhao H . Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses Using the Pattern of Observed -values. J Appl Stat. 2013; 40(9):1949-1964. PMC: 3781956. DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.800035. View