» Articles » PMID: 36245951

Cost and Cost Driver Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: Bone-Tendon-Bone Autograft Versus Hamstring Autograft

Overview
Date 2022 Oct 17
PMID 36245951
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records for primary ACLR from the institutional patient-reported outcome registry between 2009 and 2016 in 1 ambulatory surgery center. Patients receiving allograft, revision ACLR, or concomitant meniscal repair or ligament reconstruction were excluded. The total cost of care was determined using TDABC. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted between ACLR cost and group characteristics.

Results: A total of 328 patients were included; 211 (64.3%) received BTB autograft and 117 (35.7%) received hamstring autograft. The mean cost was $2,865.01 ± $263.45 (95% confidence interval: $2,829.26, $2,900.77) for BTB ACLR versus $3,377.44 ± $320.12 ($3,318.82, $3,436.05) for hamstring ACLR (p < 0.001). Operative time was 103.1 ± 25.1 (99.7, 106.5) minutes for BTB ACLR versus 113.1 ± 27.9 (108.0, 118.2) minutes for hamstring ACLR (p = 0.001). The total implant cost was $270.32 ± $97.08 ($257.15, $283.50) for BTB ACLR versus $587.36 ± $108.78 ($567.44, $607.28) for hamstring ACLR (p < 0.001). Hamstring graft (p = 0.006) and suspensory fixation on the femoral side (p = 0.011) were associated with increased costs.

Conclusions: The mean cost of care and operative time for BTB autograft ACLR are less than those for hamstring autograft ACLR. Operative time, implant choice, and graft choice were identified as modifiable cost drivers that can empower surgeons to manage primary ACLR costs while maximizing the value of the procedure.

Level Of Evidence: Economic and Decision Analysis Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Factors Affecting the Duration of Surgery in the Management of Condylar Head Fractures.

Pienkohs S, Meisgeier A, Herrmann J, Graf L, Reichert C, Trento G J Clin Med. 2023; 12(22).

PMID: 38002784 PMC: 10672676. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227172.


Autograft patellar bone-tendon-bone use does not increase operative time in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Huyke-Hernandez F, Doxey S, Only A, Sibley A, Mikhael N, Kweon C J Orthop. 2023; 45:6-12.

PMID: 37809348 PMC: 10551805. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.09.009.

References
1.
Parikh H, OHara N, Levy J, Cunningham B . Value Denominator: The Fundamentals of Costing for Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33 Suppl 7:S56-S61. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001617. View

2.
Wise K, Parikh H, Okelana B, Only A, Reams M, Harrison A . Measurement of value in rotator cuff repair: patient-level value analysis for the 1-year episode of care. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021; 31(1):72-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.004. View

3.
Barrera Oro F, Sikka R, Wolters B, Graver R, Boyd J, Nelson B . Autograft versus allograft: an economic cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(9):1219-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.04.008. View

4.
Bokshan S, Mehta S, DeFroda S, Owens B . What Are the Primary Cost Drivers of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States? A Cost-Minimization Analysis of 14,713 Patients. Arthroscopy. 2019; 35(5):1576-1581. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.013. View

5.
Mather 3rd R, Koenig L, Kocher M, Dall T, Gallo P, Scott D . Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(19):1751-9. PMC: 3779900. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01705. View