» Articles » PMID: 36245599

Skeletal Muscle and Related Protein Expression As Prognostic Factors in Thymic Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2022 Oct 17
PMID 36245599
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia and its marker, the psoas muscle index (PMI), have attracted attention as prognostic factors for various types of cancers. The fragile X-related 1 () gene is highly expressed in myocytes, and FXR1 overexpression is a candidate biomarker for poor survival in several types of cancers. Thymic squamous cell carcinoma (TSQCC) is rare, and no studies assessing its prognostic factors, particularly in terms of skeletal muscle mass and FXR1 expression, are available.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated the prognostic significance of PMI in 34 patients who underwent TSQCC resection, considering the status of FXR1 and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). PMI was calculated from the bilateral psoas muscle using preoperative computed tomography (CT). Patients were divided into two groups: low PMI (<58.2%, n=17) and normal PMI (≥58.2%, n=17). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to determine the FXR1 and PD-L1 expression levels.

Results: Low PMI was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) (5-year survival rate; 86% 100%; P=0.026) and marginally associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) (5-year survival rate; 39% 66%; P=0.090) compared with normal PMI. The immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the FXR1 intensity score (0-1+: 6% 0%; 2+-3+: 94% 100%; P=0.31), median FXR1 distribution (95% 90%; P=0.63), and PD-L1 status (high: 47% 59%; P=0.49) were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PMI might be considered as a potential prognostic factor in TSQCC and that FXR1 is widely expressed regardless of the PMI status. Skeletal muscle mass may play a role in the prognosis of TSQCC.

Citing Articles

Depiction of the Genetic Alterations and Molecular Landscapes of Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wang X, Jin H, Feng X, Liang Z, Jin R, Li X Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272824 PMC: 11394263. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172966.


Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of FXR1 across pan-cancer: Unraveling its diagnostic, prognostic, and immunological significance.

Xiao K, Ullah I, Yang F, Wang J, Hou C, Liu Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(48):e36456.

PMID: 38050239 PMC: 10695598. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036456.


Characterizing thymic tumors-how to track down rare diseases.

Lang M, Pausch T, Anamaterou C J Thorac Dis. 2023; 14(12):4571-4573.

PMID: 36647465 PMC: 9840048. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2022-21.

References
1.
Chen L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Chou M, Iijima K . Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020; 21(3):300-307.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. View

2.
Wu J, Wang Z, Jing C, Hu Y, Yang B, Hu Y . The incidence and prognosis of thymic squamous cell carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(15):e25331. PMC: 8052076. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025331. View

3.
Giaccone G, Kim C, Thompson J, McGuire C, Kallakury B, Chahine J . Pembrolizumab in patients with thymic carcinoma: a single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19(3):347-355. PMC: 10683856. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30062-7. View

4.
Ruffini E, Detterbeck F, Van Raemdonck D, Rocco G, Thomas P, Weder W . Thymic carcinoma: a cohort study of patients from the European society of thoracic surgeons database. J Thorac Oncol. 2014; 9(4):541-8. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000128. View

5.
Koga K, Matsuno Y, Noguchi M, Mukai K, Asamura H, Goya T . A review of 79 thymomas: modification of staging system and reappraisal of conventional division into invasive and non-invasive thymoma. Pathol Int. 1994; 44(5):359-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1994.tb02936.x. View