» Articles » PMID: 36244829

A Phase II Evaluation of Temsirolimus with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Followed by Temsirolimus Consolidation in Clear Cell Ovarian Cancer: An NRG Oncology Trial

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of the study was to estimate the 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) for carboplatin/paclitaxel + temsirolimus in women with newly diagnosed clear cell ovarian cancer (CCOC), compared to historical controls in this patient population.

Methods: Patients with Stage III or IV CCOC were treated with Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on Day 1, Carboplatin AUC 6 Day 1, and temsirolimus (CCI-779) 25 mg IV Days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for Cycles 1-6 or disease progression, followed by consolidation therapy with temsirolimus 25 mg Days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks cycles 7-17 or until disease progression.

Results: Ninety patients were accrued to the study: 45 in the US and Korea (US/Korea) and 45 in Japan. Twenty-two percent received ≤6 cycles of therapy while 28% completed all 17 cycles of chemotherapy. Median PFS (OS) was 11 (23) months for US/Korea and 12 (26) months for Japan. In the US, none of suboptimally debulked patients had PFS >12 months, and 49% of optimal patients did, compared to 25% and 59% in Japan. Most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and oral mucositis.

Conclusion: The carboplatin/paclitaxel + temsirolimus regimen was well tolerated. In optimally debulked patients, 54% had a PFS >12 months. This regimen did not statistically significantly increase PFS at 12 months compared to historical controls. No statistically significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between US/Korea vs Japan, or Asians vs non-Asians.

Citing Articles

Causal effect analysis of estrogen receptor associated breast cancer and clear cell ovarian cancer.

Ji L, Liu Y, Wang Z, Huang Q, Cai J, Gu H Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(6):2699-2710.

PMID: 39006281 PMC: 11236669. DOI: 10.62347/ECOO9552.


Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Pathologies to Clinical Relevance.

Steinbuch S, Luss A, Eltrop S, Gotte M, Kiesel L Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(8).

PMID: 38673891 PMC: 11050613. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084306.


Trends in survival of ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients from 2000 to 2015.

Tian B, Wang S, Xu J, Wu S, Zhou J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1360663.

PMID: 38515571 PMC: 10956514. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1360663.


Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Carcinomas: How PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway Affects Their Pathogenesis.

Driva T, Schatz C, Haybaeck J Biomolecules. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37627318 PMC: 10452661. DOI: 10.3390/biom13081253.


Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: Current State and Future Promises.

Skorda A, Bay M, Hautaniemi S, Lahtinen A, Kallunki T Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(24).

PMID: 36551745 PMC: 9777107. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246257.

References
1.
Tummala M, McGuire W . Recurrent ovarian cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2005; 3(9):723-36. View

2.
Bhoola S, Hoskins W . Diagnosis and management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107(6):1399-410. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000220516.34053.48. View

3.
Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A . Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(1):7-33. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21654. View

4.
Gill S, Shah A, Le N, Cook E, Yoshida E . Asian ethnicity-related differences in gastric cancer presentation and outcome among patients treated at a canadian cancer center. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(11):2070-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.054. View

5.
Bonome T, Lee J, Park D, Radonovich M, Pise-Masison C, Brady J . Expression profiling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(22):10602-12. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2240. View