» Articles » PMID: 36243897

A Meta-analysis of Total Neoadjuvant Therapies Combining Chemoradiotherapy with Induction or Consolidated Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Oct 15
PMID 36243897
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) combining chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with chemotherapy (CT) was a novel pre-surgical approach to cancer treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between neoadjuvant CRT (nCRT) with induction CT and nCRT with consolidated CT in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients.

Method: In July 2022, a literature search was conducted using the following public databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, retrieved all relevant articles comparing nCRT-combining induction CT with nCRT-combining-consolidated CT treatments for LARC patients.

Results: Four eligible studies were identified, including a total of 995 LARC patients: 473 in the nCRT with consolidated CT group and 522 in the nCRT with induction CT group. The organ preservation (OP) rate of the nCRT with consolidated CT group was higher than that of the nCRT with induction CT group (RR [relative risk]: 1.53; 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.09-2.14). The pathological complete response (PCR, RR: 1.22; 95% CI 0.37-2.17), the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS, RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.71-1.46), the local recurrence (LR, RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.85), rates of R0 resection (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.55-1.10), compliance (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.12-2.26), and grade 3--4 toxicities (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.57-1.06) were all similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of TNT regimens for rectal cancer, consolidative CT following nCRT was associated with similar PCR, 3-year DFS, LR, R0 resection, compliance, and grade 3-4 toxicities compared to induction CT prior to nCRT but a higher rate of organ preservation.

Citing Articles

Selecting a TNT Schedule in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Can We Predict Who Actually Benefits?.

Aschele C, Glynne-Jones R Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37174033 PMC: 10177050. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092567.

References
1.
Siegel R, Miller K, Sauer A, Fedewa S, Butterly L, Anderson J . Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(3):145-164. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21601. View

2.
Chua Y, Barbachano Y, Cunningham D, Oates J, Brown G, Wotherspoon A . Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined poor-risk rectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(3):241-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70381-X. View

3.
Gao Y, Lin J, An X, Luo J, Cai M, Cai P . Neoadjuvant sandwich treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine administered prior to, concurrently with, and following radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective phase 2 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 90(5):1153-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.021. View

4.
Cercek A, Roxburgh C, Strombom P, Smith J, Temple L, Nash G . Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4(6):e180071. PMC: 5885165. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0071. View

5.
Ludmir E, Palta M, Willett C, Czito B . Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: An emerging option. Cancer. 2017; 123(9):1497-1506. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30600. View