» Articles » PMID: 36241977

Differential Impact of Quarantine Policies for Recovered COVID-19 Cases in England: a Case Cohort Study of Surveillance Data, June to December 2020

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36241977
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: From 12th March 2020, individuals in England were advised to quarantine in their home if a household member tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. A mandatory isolation period of 10 days was introduced on 28th September 2020 and applied to all individuals with COVID-19. We assessed the frequency, timing, and characteristics of recovered COVID-19 cases requiring subsequent quarantine episodes due to household re-exposure.

Methods: In this case cohort study, all laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases notified in England (29th June to 28th December 2020) were analysed to identify consecutive household case(s). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine associations between case characteristics and need to quarantine following recent infection (within 28 days of diagnosis).

Results: Among 1,651,550 cases resident in private dwellings and Houses of Multiple Occupancy (HMOs), 744,548 (45.1%) were the only case in their home and 56,179 (3.4%) were succeeded by further household cases diagnosed within 11-28 days of their diagnosis. Of 1,641,412 cases arising in private homes, the likelihood of further household cases was highest for Bangladeshi (aOR = 2.20, 95% CI = 2.10-2.31) and Pakistani (aOR = 2.15, 95% CI = 2.08-2.22) individuals compared to White British, as well as among young people (17-24y vs. 25-64y; aOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.16-1.22), men (vs. women; aOR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04-1.08), London residents (vs. Yorkshire and Humber; aOR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.52-1.63) and areas of high deprivation (IMD 1 vs. 10; aOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.09-1.19).

Conclusion: Policies requiring quarantine on re-exposure differentially impact some of the most disadvantaged populations. Quarantine exemption for recently recovered individuals could mitigate the socioeconomic impact of responses to COVID-19 or similar infectious disease outbreaks.

References
1.
Mikolai J, Keenan K, Kulu H . Intersecting household-level health and socio-economic vulnerabilities and the COVID-19 crisis: An analysis from the UK. SSM Popul Health. 2020; 12:100628. PMC: 7330575. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100628. View

2.
Harris R, Hall J, Zaidi A, Andrews N, Dunbar J, Dabrera G . Effect of Vaccination on Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in England. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(8):759-760. PMC: 8262621. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2107717. View

3.
Campos-Matos I, Mandal S, Yates J, Ramsay M, Wilson J, Lim W . Maximising benefit, reducing inequalities and ensuring deliverability: Prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccination in the UK. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021; 2:100021. PMC: 7834926. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100021. View

4.
Nkire N, Mrklas K, Hrabok M, Gusnowski A, Vuong W, Surood S . COVID-19 Pandemic: Demographic Predictors of Self-Isolation or Self-Quarantine and Impact of Isolation and Quarantine on Perceived Stress, Anxiety, and Depression. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:553468. PMC: 7882620. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.553468. View

5.
Tomono M, Yamauchi T, Suka M, Yanagisawa H . Impact of overtime working and social interaction on the deterioration of mental well-being among full-time workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: Focusing on social isolation by household composition. J Occup Health. 2021; 63(1):e12254. PMC: 8302453. DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12254. View