Individual Dental and Skeletal Age Assessment According to Demirjian and Baccetti: Updated Norm Values for Central-European Patients

Overview

Journal J Orofac Orthop

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2022 Oct 14

PMID 36239773

Authors

Eva Paddenberg

Adrian Dees

Peter Proff

Christian Kirschneck

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Chronological age often differs from dental and skeletal age. With orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms, dental and skeletal development can be determined according to the methods published by Demirjian et al. and Baccetti et al. However, gender and skeletal class as possible confounders were frequently not considered and available norm values are not up-to-date. This retrospective cross-sectional study thus aimed to evaluate effects of skeletal class and gender on dental and skeletal age of growing patients and to generate updated norm values for contemporary Central-European patients.

Methods: A total of 551 patients were included in the dental and 733 in the skeletal age assessment, respectively. Dental analysis was based on tooth mineralisation stages in orthopantomograms (Demirjian) and skeletal age was defined by cervical vertebrae maturation stages (CVMS) in lateral cephalograms (Baccetti). Skeletal class was determined by the individualised ANB angle of Panagiotidis/Witt. With nonlinear regression analysis a formula for determining dental age was established. Effects of gender and skeletal class were evaluated and updated norm values generated.

Results: Inter- and intrarater reliability tests revealed at least substantial measurement concordance for tooth mineralisation and CVMS. Demirjian stages and CVMS significantly depended on gender with girls developing earlier. Skeletal class significantly affected skeletal age only, but without clinical relevance. Updated norm values for dental age differed significantly from the original values of Demirjian and the values for skeletal age differed from those published by Baccetti.

Conclusion: Optimised norms, separated by gender, increase precision in determining individual dental and skeletal age during orthodontic treatment planning. Further studies analysing the effect of skeletal class on dental and skeletal development are needed.

Citing Articles

Bone age and dental age to assess criminal responsibility: Part I.

Palmela Pereira C, Lameiro M, Rodrigues A, Salvado F, Santos R Int J Legal Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40021559 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-025-03451-z.

Differences in Tooth Development in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

Schwarting M, Wehrbein H, Schmidtmann I, Erbe C, Wriedt S Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025; 11(1):e70086.

PMID: 39985285 PMC: 11845872. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.70086.

Radiologic assessment of third molar development and cervical vertebral maturation to validate age of majority in a Mexican population.

Marquez-Ruiz A, Gonzalez-Herrera L, Luna J, Valenzuela A Int J Legal Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39969570 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-025-03450-0.

Comparative Analysis of Dental Age Estimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Assessing Gender-Specific Accuracy of the Demirjian and Nolla Methods Across Different Age Groups.

Al-Juhani A, Binshalhoub A, Showail S, Alraythi M, Alzahrani A, Almutiri N Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75031.

PMID: 39749055 PMC: 11694602. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75031.

Predicting Mandibular Growth Potential Based on Cervical Vertebral Bone Age Using Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs in a Sample of the Saudi Population.

Madiraju G, Almugla Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410549 PMC: 11475966. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192145.

References

Lauc T, Nakas E, Latic-Dautovic M, Dzemidzic V, Tiro A, Rupic I . Dental Age in Orthodontic Patients with Different Skeletal Patterns. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:8976284. PMC: 5376414. DOI: 10.1155/2017/8976284. View

Mito T, Sato K, Mitani H . Cervical vertebral bone age in girls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122(4):380-5. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.126896. View

Gabriel D, Southard K, Qian F, Marshall S, Franciscus R, Southard T . Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(4):478.e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.028. View

Blenkin M, Evans W . Age estimation from the teeth using a modified Demirjian system. J Forensic Sci. 2010; 55(6):1504-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01491.x. View

Liversidge H, Smith B, Maber M . Bias and accuracy of age estimation using developing teeth in 946 children. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010; 143(4):545-54. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21349. View

Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr J . An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72(4):316-23. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0316:AIVOTC>2.0.CO;2. View

Heinrich-Weltzien R, Zorn C, Monse B, Kromeyer-Hauschild K . Relationship between malnutrition and the number of permanent teeth in Filipino 10- to 13-year-olds. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013:205950. PMC: 3773387. DOI: 10.1155/2013/205950. View

Jamroz G, Kuijpers-Jagtman A, vant Hof M, Katsaros C . Dental maturation in short and long facial types. Is there a difference?. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(5):768-72. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0768:DMISAL]2.0.CO;2. View

Jeelani W, Fida M, Shaikh A . The duration of pubertal growth peak among three skeletal classes. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21(5):67-74. PMC: 5125173. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.5.067-074.oar. View

10.

Khdairi N, Halilah T, Khandakji M, Jost-Brinkmann P, Bartzela T . The adaptation of Demirjian's dental age estimation method on North German children. Forensic Sci Int. 2019; 303:109927. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109927. View

11.

Hellsing E . Cervical vertebral dimensions in 8-, 11-, and 15-year-old children. Acta Odontol Scand. 1991; 49(4):207-13. DOI: 10.3109/00016359109005909. View

12.

Schopf P . [Root calcification and tooth eruption in the mixed dentition. A study in panoramic x-rays]. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1970; 31(1):39-56. DOI: 10.1007/BF02024849. View

13.

MOORREES C, Fanning E, HUNT Jr E . AGE VARIATION OF FORMATION STAGES FOR TEN PERMANENT TEETH. J Dent Res. 1963; 42:1490-502. DOI: 10.1177/00220345630420062701. View

14.

Hassel B, Farman A . Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107(1):58-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70157-5. View

15.

Mourelle R, Barberia E, Gallardo N, Lucavechi T . Correlation between dental maturation and bone growth markers in paediatric patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008; 9(1):23-9. View

16.

Wong R, Alkhal H, Rabie A . Use of cervical vertebral maturation to determine skeletal age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(4):484.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.033. View

17.

Mito T, Sato K, Mitani H . Predicting mandibular growth potential with cervical vertebral bone age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124(2):173-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00401-3. View

18.

Damian M, Cechinato F, Molina R, Woitchunas F . Relationship between cranial and mandibular growth and the stages of maturation of the cervical vertebrae. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008; 15(2):115-9. PMC: 4327241. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000200008. View

19.

Qureshi T, Duggal R, Chaudhari P . Correlation between chronological age and skeletal maturity in different malocclusions: A retrospective study. Int Orthod. 2021; 19(3):453-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.06.007. View

20.

Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara Jr J . Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118(3):335-40. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.107009. View