» Articles » PMID: 36237316

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-specific Survival in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma: A Study Based on SEER Database

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36237316
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is highly prevalent, prone to metastasis, and has a poor prognosis after metastasis. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a prognostic model to predict the individualized prognosis of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC).

Patients And Methods: Data of 1790 patients with mccRCC, registered from 2010 to 2015, were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The included patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 1253) and a validation set (n = 537) based on the ratio of 7:3. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the important independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was then constructed to predict cancer specific survival (CSS). The performance of the nomogram was internally validated by using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic curves, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA). We compared the nomogram with the TNM staging system. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to validate the application of the risk stratification system.

Results: Diagnostic age, T-stage, N-stage, bone metastases, brain metastases, liver metastases, lung metastases, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and histological grade were identified as independent predictors of CSS. The C-index of training and validation sets are 0.707 and 0.650 respectively. In the training set, the AUC of CSS predicted by nomogram in patients with mccRCC at 1-, 3- and 5-years were 0.770, 0.758, and 0.757, respectively. And that in the validation set were 0.717, 0.700, and 0.700 respectively. Calibration plots also showed great prediction accuracy. Compared with the TNM staging system, NRI and IDI results showed that the predictive ability of the nomogram was greatly improved, and DCA showed that patients obtained clinical benefits. The risk stratification system can significantly distinguish the patients with different survival risks.

Conclusion: In this study, we developed and validated a nomogram to predict the CSS rate in patients with mccRCC. It showed consistent reliability and clinical applicability. Nomogram may assist clinicians in evaluating the risk factors of patients and formulating an optimal individualized treatment strategy.

Citing Articles

A Novel Nomogram for the Prediction and Evaluation of Prognosis in Patients with Early-onset Kidney Cancer: a Population-based Study.

Lv D, Wang Q, Sun K, Li J, Zhou H, Wen J J Cancer. 2025; 16(4):1189-1201.

PMID: 39895778 PMC: 11786041. DOI: 10.7150/jca.104569.


Predicting Survival of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Treated with VEGFR-TKI-Based Sequential Therapy.

Angulo J, Larrinaga G, Lecumberri D, Iturregui A, Solano-Iturri J, Lawrie C Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(16).

PMID: 39199559 PMC: 11352619. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162786.


Immune infiltration and prognosis in gastric cancer: role of NAD+ metabolism-related markers.

Xing Y, Zhang Z, Gao W, Song W, Li T PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17833.

PMID: 39099656 PMC: 11297443. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17833.


A dynamic visualization clinical tool constructed and validated based on the SEER database for screening the optimal surgical candidates for bone metastasis in primary kidney cancer.

Jiang L, Tong Y, Wang J, Jiang J, Gong Y, Zhu D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3561.

PMID: 38347099 PMC: 10861469. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54085-x.


Two simple-to-use web-based nomograms to predict overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with extremity fibrosarcoma.

Li Y, Yang J, Zhao L, Chen B, An Y Front Oncol. 2023; 12:942542.

PMID: 36861108 PMC: 9968967. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942542.

References
1.
Yusim I, Mermershtain W, Neulander E, Eidelberg I, Gusakova I, Kaneti J . Influence of age on the prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Onkologie. 2003; 25(6):548-50. DOI: 10.1159/000068626. View

2.
Wu S, Chen J, Zhang Q, Tang C, Zhang X, Tang M . A New Metastatic Lymph Node Classification-based Survival Predicting Model in Patients With Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A Derivation and Validation Study. EBioMedicine. 2018; 32:134-141. PMC: 6021266. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.05.022. View

3.
Harada K, Nozawa M, Uemura M, Tatsugami K, Osawa T, Yamana K . Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan. Int J Urol. 2018; 26(2):202-210. DOI: 10.1111/iju.13830. View

4.
Tadayoni A, Paschall A, Malayeri A . Assessing lymph node status in patients with kidney cancer. Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 7(5):766-773. PMC: 6212621. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.07.19. View

5.
Naito S, Yamamoto N, Takayama T, Muramoto M, Shinohara N, Nishiyama K . Prognosis of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the cytokine era: a cooperative group report of 1463 patients. Eur Urol. 2009; 57(2):317-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.026. View