» Articles » PMID: 36236500

Towards a Policy Development Methodology for Human-Centred IoT Collectives

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36236500
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Embedding ethical concepts into smart Internet-connected devices and making them behave in a more human-centred manner, i.e., ethically and in a socially acceptable manner, has received significant attention in the software industry. To make smart devices behave in more human-centered manners, it is important to develop a methodology for defining smart devices' key roles and mapping them with socio-ethical and administrative policies. This paper proposes a policy development methodology for making smart devices more human-centred by following its four phases i.e., concept development, defining and mapping policies, implementing the processing of policies, and deploying the devices. The suggested methodology may be used in a variety of situations where smart devices interact with people. For illustration, the proposed methodology has been applied to three different settings, including a supermarket, a children's hospital, and early learning centers, where each phase defined in the methodology has been followed. The application of the methodology to smart internet-connected devices, including robots, smart cameras, and smart speakers, has shown significant results. It has been observed that the devices behave in more human-centric ways while performing their core functions, adhering to socio-ethical policies.

References
1.
Dawe J, Sutherland C, Barco A, Broadbent E . Can social robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019; 3(1):e000371. PMC: 6361370. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000371. View

2.
Tanaka M, Ishii A, Yamano E, Ogikubo H, Okazaki M, Kamimura K . Effect of a human-type communication robot on cognitive function in elderly women living alone. Med Sci Monit. 2012; 18(9):CR550-7. PMC: 3560641. DOI: 10.12659/msm.883350. View

3.
Cawthorne D, Robbins-van Wynsberghe A . An Ethical Framework for the Design, Development, Implementation, and Assessment of Drones Used in Public Healthcare. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020; 26(5):2867-2891. PMC: 7550294. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00233-1. View

4.
Wang R, Sudhama A, Begum M, Huq R, Mihailidis A . Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016; 29(1):67-79. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610216001435. View

5.
Cummings M . Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007; 12(4):701-15. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-006-0065-0. View