» Articles » PMID: 36236204

A Review on Locomotion Mode Recognition and Prediction When Using Active Orthoses and Exoskeletons

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36236204
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding how to seamlessly adapt the assistance of lower-limb wearable assistive devices (active orthosis (AOs) and exoskeletons) to human locomotion modes (LMs) is challenging. Several algorithms and sensors have been explored to recognize and predict the users' LMs. Nevertheless, it is not yet clear which are the most used and effective sensor and classifier configurations in AOs/exoskeletons and how these devices' control is adapted according to the decoded LMs. To explore these aspects, we performed a systematic review by electronic search in and databases, including published studies from 1 January 2010 to 31 August 2022. Sixteen studies were included and scored with 84.7 ± 8.7% quality. Decoding focused on level-ground walking along with ascent/descent stairs tasks performed by healthy subjects. Time-domain raw data from inertial measurement unit sensors were the most used data. Different classifiers were employed considering the LMs to decode (accuracy above 90% for all tasks). Five studies have adapted the assistance of AOs/exoskeletons attending to the decoded LM, in which only one study predicted the new LM before its occurrence. Future research is encouraged to develop decoding tools considering data from people with lower-limb impairments walking at self-selected speeds while performing daily LMs with AOs/exoskeletons.

Citing Articles

Novel neuromuscular controllers with simplified muscle model and enhanced reflex modulation: A comparative study in hip exoskeletons.

Manzoori A, Messara S, Di Russo A, Ijspeert A, Bouri M Wearable Technol. 2025; 5():e21.

PMID: 39811479 PMC: 11729522. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2024.11.


Characteristic Changes of the Stance-Phase Plantar Pressure Curve When Walking Uphill and Downhill: Cross-Sectional Study.

Wolff C, Steinheimer P, Warmerdam E, Dahmen T, Slusallek P, Schlinkmann C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e44948.

PMID: 38718385 PMC: 11112465. DOI: 10.2196/44948.


Prediction of Gait Kinematics and Kinetics: A Systematic Review of EMG and EEG Signal Use and Their Contribution to Prediction Accuracy.

El Yaakoubi N, McDonald C, Lennon O Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37892892 PMC: 10604078. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10101162.

References
1.
Xu D, Wang Q . On-board Training Strategy for IMU-Based Real-Time Locomotion Recognition of Transtibial Amputees With Robotic Prostheses. Front Neurorobot. 2020; 14:47. PMC: 7642451. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00047. View

2.
Moreira L, Figueiredo J, Fonseca P, Vilas-Boas J, Santos C . Lower limb kinematic, kinetic, and EMG data from young healthy humans during walking at controlled speeds. Sci Data. 2021; 8(1):103. PMC: 8041842. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00881-3. View

3.
Koopman B, Van Asseldonk E, Van Der Kooij H . Speed-dependent reference joint trajectory generation for robotic gait support. J Biomech. 2014; 47(6):1447-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.037. View

4.
Lyu M, Chen W, Ding X, Wang J . Knee exoskeleton enhanced with artificial intelligence to provide assistance-as-needed. Rev Sci Instrum. 2019; 90(9):094101. DOI: 10.1063/1.5091660. View

5.
Labarriere F, Thomas E, Calistri L, Optasanu V, Gueugnon M, Ornetti P . Machine Learning Approaches for Activity Recognition and/or Activity Prediction in Locomotion Assistive Devices-A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(21). PMC: 7664393. DOI: 10.3390/s20216345. View