» Articles » PMID: 36235614

Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic New-Born Screening Result in The Netherlands: The Parental Perspective

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36235614
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the Netherlands, abnormal New-Born Screening (NBS) results are communicated to parents by the general practitioner (GP). Good communication and consequential trust in professionals is of the utmost importance in the treatment of phenylketonuria (PKU). The aim of this study was to assess parental satisfaction regarding the communication of an abnormal NBS result for PKU in the Netherlands. An email containing the link to a web-based questionnaire was sent by the Dutch PKU Association to their members. Responses to open questions were categorized, data of both open and closed questions were analysed with descriptive statistics and the Chi-Square test using SPSS. Out of 113 parents of a child with PKU (born between 1979 and 2020), 68 stated they were overall unsatisfied with the first communication of the NBS result. Seventy-five parents indicated that wrong or no information about PKU was given. A significant decrease was found in the number of parents being contact by their own GP over the course of 40 years (p < 0.05). More than half of all parents were overall unsatisfied with the first communication of the abnormal NBS result for PKU. Further research on how to optimize communication of an abnormal NBS results is necessary.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and predictors of parental distress at the communication of positivity at newborn screening for metabolic diseases: an Italian longitudinal study.

Bani M, Russo S, Gasperini S, Crescitelli V, Menni F, Furlan F BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024; 8(1).

PMID: 39667953 PMC: 11667425. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003103.


Recent Advances in Phenylketonuria: A Review.

Zuniga Vinueza A Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40459.

PMID: 37456395 PMC: 10349532. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40459.

References
1.
Burgard P, Rupp K, Lindner M, Haege G, Rigter T, Weinreich S . Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2. From screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012; 35(4):613-25. DOI: 10.1007/s10545-012-9484-z. View

2.
Almannai M, Marom R, Sutton V . Newborn screening: a review of history, recent advancements, and future perspectives in the era of next generation sequencing. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016; 28(6):694-699. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000414. View

3.
Blom M, Bredius R, Jansen M, Weijman G, Kemper E, Vermont C . Parents' Perspectives and Societal Acceptance of Implementation of Newborn Screening for SCID in the Netherlands. J Clin Immunol. 2020; 41(1):99-108. PMC: 7846522. DOI: 10.1007/s10875-020-00886-4. View

4.
Buist N, Tuerck J . The practitioner's role in newborn screening. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1992; 39(2):199-211. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38291-8. View

5.
Ulph F, Cullinan T, Qureshi N, Kai J . Parents' responses to receiving sickle cell or cystic fibrosis carrier results for their child following newborn screening. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014; 23(4):459-65. PMC: 4666569. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.126. View