» Articles » PMID: 36235362

Root Morphology and Biomass Allocation of 50 Annual Ephemeral Species in Relation to Two Soil Condition

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36235362
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different organ morphologies determine the manner in which plants acquire resources, and the proportion of biomass of each organ is a critical driving force for organs to function in the future. Regrettably, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of root traits and seedling biomass allocation. Accordingly, we investigated and collected the seedling root morphological traits and biomass allocation of 50 annual ephemeral species to clarify the adaptation to environment. The findings of this study showed that there was a significantly negative correlation between root tissue density (RTD) and root diameter (RD) (p < 0.05), which did not conform to the hypothesis of the one-dimensional root economics spectrum (RES). On this basis, we divided 50 plant species into those rooted in dense or gravelly sand (DGS) or loose sand (LS) groups according to two soil conditions to determine the differences in root strategy and plant strategy between the two groups of plants. Our study revealed that the species rooting DGS tend to adopt a high penetration root strategy. However, the species rooting LS adopt high resource acquisition efficiency. At the whole-plant level, 50 species of ephemerals were distributed along the resource acquisition and conservation axis. Species rooting DGS tend to adopt the conservation strategy of high stem biomass fraction and low resource acquisition efficiency, while species rooting LS tend to adopt the acquisition strategy of high root and leaf biomass fraction and high resource acquisition efficiency. The research results provide a theoretical basis for the restoration and protection of vegetation in desert areas.

Citing Articles

Precipitation Dominates the Allocation Strategy of Above- and Belowground Biomass in Plants on Macro Scales.

Wang X, Chen X, Xu J, Ji Y, Du X, Gao J Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(15).

PMID: 37570997 PMC: 10421374. DOI: 10.3390/plants12152843.


The genetic architecture of trait covariation in , a desert tree.

Lu K, Wang X, Gong H, Yang D, Ye M, Fang Q Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1149879.

PMID: 37089657 PMC: 10113509. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1149879.


Effects of Soil Water Shortage on Seedling Shoot and Root Growth of Saragolle Lucana Tetraploid Wheat ( Desf.) Landrace.

Bochicchio R, Labella R, Rossi R, Perniola M, Amato M Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(24).

PMID: 36559604 PMC: 9786060. DOI: 10.3390/plants11243492.

References
1.
Lynch J . Root Architecture and Plant Productivity. Plant Physiol. 1995; 109(1):7-13. PMC: 157559. DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.1.7. View

2.
Comas L, Eissenstat D . Patterns in root trait variation among 25 co-existing North American forest species. New Phytol. 2009; 182(4):919-928. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02799.x. View

3.
Freschet G, Roumet C, Comas L, Weemstra M, Bengough A, Rewald B . Root traits as drivers of plant and ecosystem functioning: current understanding, pitfalls and future research needs. New Phytol. 2020; 232(3):1123-1158. DOI: 10.1111/nph.17072. View

4.
Eissenstat D, Achor D . Anatomical characteristics of roots of citrus rootstocks that vary in specific root length. New Phytol. 2021; 141(2):309-321. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00342.x. View

5.
Wright I, Reich P, Cornelissen J, Falster D, Garnier E, Hikosaka K . Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytol. 2005; 166(2):485-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x. View