» Articles » PMID: 36233609

Simple Application and Adherence to Gout Guidelines Enables Disease Control: An Observational Study in French Referral Centres

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36233609
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In a context of therapeutic inertia, the French Society of Rheumatology (SFR) published its first recommendations on gout in 2020, which were deliberately simple and concise. The objectives of the study were to determine the profile of patients referred to French gout-expert centres, and to examine the results of their management and the factors leading to those results. Methods: Three hundred patients attending a first visit for gout management in three French referral centres were retrospectively and randomly included in this multicentre observational study. Visits were performed at baseline (M0) and scheduled for month 6 (M6), month 12 (M12), and month 24 (M24). Results: Patients were 81% male and had a mean age 62.2 ± 15.2 years. Management followed French recommendations after the baseline visit in 94.9% of cases. SU levels were below 6.0 mg/dL in 59.4% of patients at M6, 67.9% at M12, and 78.6% at M24, with increasing clinical improvement (i.e., flare decrease) over 2 years of follow-up. At M24, 50% of patients were treated with allopurinol (313 ± 105 mg/d), which exceeded renal restrictions of doses in 61.5% of them, and 48.2% received febuxostat (84 ± 36 mg/d). The need for a sufficient dosage of ULT was the only predictive factor found for successful achievement of SU levels < 6.0 mg/dL at a given visit. Conclusions: Simple application of gout-management guidelines is feasible in clinical practice and is efficient, with a majority of patients achieving SU targets and clinical improvement.

Citing Articles

Emerging Urate-Lowering Drugs and Pharmacologic Treatment Strategies for Gout: A Narrative Review.

Terkeltaub R Drugs. 2023; 83(16):1501-1521.

PMID: 37819612 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-023-01944-y.

References
1.
Pascart T, Liote F . Gout: state of the art after a decade of developments. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018; 58(1):27-44. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key002. View

2.
Liote F, Lancrenon S, Lanz S, Guggenbuhl P, Lambert C, Saraux A . GOSPEL: prospective survey of gout in France. Part I: design and patient characteristics (n = 1003). Joint Bone Spine. 2012; 79(5):464-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.12.006. View

3.
Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Castaneda-Sanabria J . 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016; 76(1):29-42. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707. View

4.
Stamp L, Barclay M . How to prevent allopurinol hypersensitivity reactions?. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017; 57(suppl_1):i35-i41. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex422. View

5.
Saag K, Khanna P, Keenan R, Ohlman S, Osterling Koskinen L, Sparve E . A Randomized, Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Anakinra in the Treatment of Gout Flares. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73(8):1533-1542. DOI: 10.1002/art.41699. View