» Articles » PMID: 36232732

On the Relevance of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Metabolic Landscape Mapping

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36232732
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) prognosis is disappointing, with current treatment strategies being based on a "fit for all" principle and not taking distinct sarcoma subtypes specificities and genetic/metabolic differences into consideration. The paucity of precision therapies in STS reflects the shortage of studies that seek to decipher the sarcomagenesis mechanisms. There is an urge to improve STS diagnosis precision, refine STS classification criteria, and increase the capability of identifying STS prognostic biomarkers. Single-omics and multi-omics studies may play a key role on decodifying sarcomagenesis. Metabolomics provides a singular insight, either as a single-omics approach or as part of a multi-omics strategy, into the metabolic adaptations that support sarcomagenesis. Although STS metabolome is scarcely characterized, untargeted and targeted metabolomics approaches employing different data acquisition methods such as mass spectrometry (MS), MS imaging, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provided important information, warranting further studies. New chromatographic, MS, NMR-based, and flow cytometry-based methods will offer opportunities to therapeutically target metabolic pathways and to monitorize the response to such metabolic targeting therapies. Here we provide a comprehensive review of STS omics applications, comprising a detailed analysis of studies focused on the metabolic landscape of these tumors.

Citing Articles

The changes in metabolomics profile induced by intermittent theta burst stimulation in major depressive disorder: an exploratory study.

Luo X, Zhou Y, Yuan S, Chen X, Zhang B BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):550.

PMID: 37516823 PMC: 10387200. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05044-9.

References
1.
Zwang Y, Oren M, Yarden Y . Consistency test of the cell cycle: roles for p53 and EGR1. Cancer Res. 2012; 72(5):1051-4. PMC: 3294127. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3382. View

2.
Miyata T, Sonoda K, Tomikawa J, Tayama C, Okamura K, Maehara K . Genomic, Epigenomic, and Transcriptomic Profiling towards Identifying Omics Features and Specific Biomarkers That Distinguish Uterine Leiomyosarcoma and Leiomyoma at Molecular Levels. Sarcoma. 2016; 2015:412068. PMC: 4707342. DOI: 10.1155/2015/412068. View

3.
Wang C, Li C, Hsieh T, Chien S, Liu G, Tsai K . Characterization of bone and soft-tissue tumors with in vivo 1H MR spectroscopy: initial results. Radiology. 2004; 232(2):599-605. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2322031441. View

4.
Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S . Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998; 279(5350):577-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.279.5350.577. View

5.
Blay J, Ray-Coquard I . Sarcoma in 2016: Evolving biological understanding and treatment of sarcomas. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016; 14(2):78-80. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.200. View