» Articles » PMID: 36232083

An Adaptive Motivation Approach to Understanding the 'How' and 'Why' of Wellbeing

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36232083
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A new model provides insight into the 'how' and 'why' of wellbeing to better understand the 'what'. Informed by evolutionary psychology and neuroscience, it proposes that systems for adaptive motivation underpin experiential and reflective wellbeing. The model proposes that the brain learns to predict situations, and errors arise between the predictions and experience. These prediction errors drive emotional experience, learning, motivation, decision-making, and the formation of wellbeing-relevant memories. The model differentiates four layers of wellbeing: objective, experiential, reflective, and narrative, which relate to the model in different ways. Constituents of wellbeing, human motives, and specific emotions integrate into the model. A simple computational implementation of the model reproduced several established wellbeing phenomena, including: the greater frequency of pleasant to unpleasant emotions, the stronger emotional salience of unpleasant emotions, hedonic adaptation to changes in circumstances, heritable influences on wellbeing, and affective forecasting errors. It highlights the importance of individual differences, and implies that high wellbeing will correlate with the experience of infrequent, routine, and predictable avoidance cues and frequent, varied, and novel approach cues. The model suggests that wellbeing arises directly from a system for adaptive motivation. This system functions like a mental dashboard that calls attention to situational changes and motivates the kinds of behaviours that gave humans a relative advantage in their ancestral environment. The model offers a set of fundamental principles and processes that may underlie diverse conceptualisations of wellbeing.

Citing Articles

Social Networks, New Technologies, and Wellbeing-An Interview Study on Factors Influencing Older Adults' Successful Ageing.

Betlej A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(7).

PMID: 37047895 PMC: 10094130. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075279.

References
1.
Archontaki D, Lewis G, Bates T . Genetic influences on psychological well-being: a nationally representative twin study. J Pers. 2012; 81(2):221-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00787.x. View

2.
Lemaire B, Portrat S . A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:416. PMC: 5891628. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00416. View

3.
Schultz W . Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016; 18(1):23-32. PMC: 4826767. View

4.
Tov W . Daily experiences and well-being: do memories of events matter?. Cogn Emot. 2012; 26(8):1371-89. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2012.660135. View

5.
Villano W, Otto A, Ezie C, Gillis R, Heller A . Temporal dynamics of real-world emotion are more strongly linked to prediction error than outcome. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020; 149(9):1755-1766. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000740. View