» Articles » PMID: 36231909

Managers' Action-Guiding Mental Models Towards Mental Health-Related Organizational Interventions-A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36231909
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research indicates that managers' active support is essential for the successful implementation of mental health-related organizational interventions. However, there is currently little insight into what subjective beliefs and perceptions (=mental models) make leaders support such interventions. To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative systematic review of this specific topic, and it considers 17 qualitative studies of managers' perspective. Based on the theory of planned behavior, this review provides an overview of three action-guiding factors (attitudes, organizational norms and behavioral control) that can serve as starting points for engaging managers in the implementation of mental health-related measures and ensuring their success. Our results provide evidence that supportive organizational norms may particularly help to create a common sense of responsibility among managers and foster their perceived controllability with respect to changing working conditions. Our study thus contributes to a more differentiated understanding of managers' mental models of health-related organizational interventions.

Citing Articles

An exploration of changes in the mental models of middle management and their association with activities to implement a dialogue tool to address mental health in the workplace.

Anzion L, Schaafsma F, Boot C, Formanoy M, Schelvis R BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):623.

PMID: 39953447 PMC: 11829359. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21702-x.


Beyond image: evaluating the perceived effectiveness of workplace mental health programs in the insurance sector.

Barbosa I, de Oliveira E BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):218.

PMID: 39827336 PMC: 11748580. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21302-9.

References
1.
Murta S, Sanderson K, Oldenburg B . Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: a systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2007; 21(4):248-54. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4.248. View

2.
Downey A, Sharp D . Why do managers allocate resources to workplace health promotion programmes in countries with national health coverage?. Health Promot Int. 2007; 22(2):102-11. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dam002. View

3.
Semmer N . Job stress interventions and the organization of work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006; 32(6):515-27. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1056. View

4.
Havermans B, Brouwers E, Hoek R, Anema J, van der Beek A, Boot C . Work stress prevention needs of employees and supervisors. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):642. PMC: 5963034. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5535-1. View

5.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D, Frings-Dresen M . Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review. Occup Med (Lond). 2010; 60(4):277-86. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqq081. View