» Articles » PMID: 36231399

Comparison of US and EU Prices for Orphan Drugs in the Perspective of the Considered US Orphan Drugs Act Modifications and Discussed Price-Regulation Mechanisms Adjustments in US and European Union

Abstract

The 2019 worldwide sales of Orphan Drugs were estimated at $136 billion USD, which constituted 16% of the global pharmaceutical prescription market and is expected to grow by 12% in the next 5 years. A better understanding of Orphan Drug pricing may contribute to on-going discussions on Orphan Drug Act (ODA) corrections in US or modifications of price setting mechanisms in EU. The objective of the study was comparison and analysis of the prices of Orphan Drugs in US and EU. All drugs with Orphan Drug status were compared in the US and EU. For the US prices, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) was sourced. The EU List Prices came from six EU countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Poland, Spain. We found US prices to be higher than the six selected EU countries. The average Price Ratio was 1.64. The prices across EU countries were more homogeneous, while the number of the reimbursed and therefore available to patient medicines varied and was correlated with GDP per capita r = 0.87. Considered implementation of the External Reference Price system in US may generate significant savings in the US but may result in upward pressure on pricing of Orphan Drugs in EU. Centralization of the Orphan Drugs pricing negotiations in EU may prevent such development and offer a win-win opportunity for all involved parties.

Citing Articles

Debates over orphan drug pricing: a meta-narrative literature review.

Hanchard M Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025; 20(1):107.

PMID: 40055799 PMC: 11887186. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-025-03634-2.


Variables affecting new drug prices in South Korea's pricing system.

Lee D, Cho S, Lee D, Kang S, Lee J Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1370915.

PMID: 38783941 PMC: 11113548. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1370915.

References
1.
Kanavos P, Ferrario A, Vandoros S, Anderson G . Higher US branded drug prices and spending compared to other countries may stem partly from quick uptake of new drugs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(4):753-61. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0920. View

2.
Levy J, Rosenberg M, Vanness D . A Transparent and Consistent Approach to Assess US Outpatient Drug Costs for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses. Value Health. 2018; 21(6):677-684. PMC: 6394851. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.013. View

3.
Fellows G, Hollis A . Funding innovation for treatment for rare diseases: adopting a cost-based yardstick approach. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013; 8:180. PMC: 3832748. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-180. View

4.
Venker B, Stephenson K, Gellad W . Assessment of Spending in Medicare Part D If Medication Prices From the Department of Veterans Affairs Were Used. JAMA Intern Med. 2019; 179(3):431-433. PMC: 6439699. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5874. View

5.
DiMasi J, Grabowski H, Hansen R . Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ. 2016; 47:20-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012. View