» Articles » PMID: 36231375

Identifying Health Equity Factors That Influence the Public's Perception of COVID-19 Health Information and Recommendations: A Scoping Review

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted global public health and public trust in health recommendations. Trust in health information may waver in the context of health inequities. The objective of this scoping review is to map evidence on public perceptions of COVID-19 prevention information using the PROGRESS-Plus health equity framework. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo, and Embase databases from January 2020 to July 2021. We identified 792 citations and 31 studies published in 15 countries that met all inclusion criteria. The majority (30/31; 96.7%) of the studies used an observational design (74.2% cross-sectional, 16.1% cohort, 6.5% case study, 3.2% experimental trials). Most studies (61.3%) reported on perception, understanding, and uptake, and 35.5% reported on engagement, compliance, and adherence to COVID-19 measures. The most frequently reported sources of COVID-related information were social media, TV, news (newspapers/news websites), and government sources. We identified five important equity factors related to public trust and uptake of recommendations: education and health literacy (19 studies; 61.3%), gender (15 studies; 48.4%), age (15 studies; 48.4%), socioeconomic status (11 studies; 35.5%), and place of residence (10 studies; 32.3%). Our review suggests that equity factors play a role in public perception of COVID-19 information and recommendations. A future systematic review could be conducted to estimate the impact of equity factors on perception and behavior outcomes.

Citing Articles

Health literacy demand and attitudes toward COVID-19 prevention measures among Korean American older adults and their caregivers.

Han H, Yun J, Min D, Razaz M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2941.

PMID: 39443891 PMC: 11515590. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20427-7.


Effectiveness of a telerehabilitation intervention using ReCOVery APP of long COVID patients: a randomized, 3-month follow-up clinical trial.

Samper-Pardo M, Leon-Herrera S, Olivan-Blazquez B, Mendez-Lopez F, Dominguez-Garcia M, Sanchez-Recio R Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7943.

PMID: 37193738 PMC: 10187508. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35058-y.

References
1.
Basch C, Basch C, Hillyer G, Meleo-Erwin Z, Zagnit E . YouTube Videos and Informed Decision-Making About COVID-19 Vaccination: Successive Sampling Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021; 7(5):e28352. PMC: 8104074. DOI: 10.2196/28352. View

2.
Lotfi T, Stevens A, Akl E, Falavigna M, Kredo T, Mathew J . Getting trustworthy guidelines into the hands of decision-makers and supporting their consideration of contextual factors for implementation globally: recommendation mapping of COVID-19 guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 135:182-186. PMC: 8022513. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.034. View

3.
Patil U, Kostareva U, Hadley M, Manganello J, Okan O, Dadaczynski K . Health Literacy, Digital Health Literacy, and COVID-19 Pandemic Attitudes and Behaviors in U.S. College Students: Implications for Interventions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(6). PMC: 8004744. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063301. View

4.
Pottie K, Smith M, Matthews M, Santesso N, Magwood O, Kredo T . A multistakeholder development process to prioritize and translate COVID-19 health recommendations for patients, caregivers and the public. A case study of the COVID-19 recommendation map. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022; 148:104-114. PMC: 9055415. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.012. View

5.
Cutler D, Summers L . The COVID-19 Pandemic and the $16 Trillion Virus. JAMA. 2020; 324(15):1495-1496. PMC: 7604733. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.19759. View