» Articles » PMID: 36231346

Effects of Different Pedaling Positions on Muscle Usage and Energy Expenditure in Amateur Cyclists

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36231346
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Inappropriate cycling positions may affect muscle usage strategy and raise the level of fatigue or risk of sport injury. Dynamic bike fitting is a growing trend meant to help cyclists select proper bikes and adjust them to fit their ergometry. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the "knee forward of foot" (KFOF) distance, an important dynamic bike fitting variable, influences the muscle activation, muscle usage strategy, and rate of energy expenditure during cycling.

Methods: Six amateur cyclists were recruited to perform the short-distance ride test (SRT) and the graded exercise tests (GXT) with pedaling positions at four different KFOF distances (+20, 0, -20, and -40 mm). The surface electromyographic (EMG) and portable energy metabolism systems were used to monitor the muscle activation and energy expenditure. The outcome measures included the EMG root-mean-square (RMS) amplitudes of eight muscles in the lower extremity during the SRT, the regression line of the changes in the EMG RMS amplitude and median frequency (MF), and the heart rate and oxygen consumption during the GXT.

Results: Our results revealed significant differences in the muscle activation of vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and semitendinosus among four different pedaling positions during the SRT. During GXT, no statistically significant differences in muscle usage strategy and energy expenditure were found among different KFOF. However, most cyclists had the highest rate of energy expenditure with either KFOF at -40 mm or 20 mm.

Conclusions: The KFOF distance altered muscle activation in the SRT; however, no significant influence on the muscle usage strategy was found in the GXT. A higher rate of energy expenditure in the extreme pedaling positions of KFOF was observed in most amateur cyclists, so professional assistance for proper bike fitting was recommended.

Citing Articles

A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Pedaling Force Profile in Cycling.

Ahmadi R, Rasoulian S, Veisari S, Parsaei A, Heidary H, Herzog W Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409480 PMC: 11479353. DOI: 10.3390/s24196440.


Continuous blood flow restriction during repeated-sprint exercise increases peripheral but not systemic physiological and perceptual demands.

Mckee J, Girard O, Peiffer J, Dempsey A, Smedley K, Scott B Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 24(6):703-712.

PMID: 38874946 PMC: 11235999. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12106.

References
1.
Razanskas P, Verikas A, Olsson C, Viberg P . Predicting Blood Lactate Concentration and Oxygen Uptake from sEMG Data during Fatiguing Cycling Exercise. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(8):20480-500. PMC: 4570431. DOI: 10.3390/s150820480. View

2.
Deakon R . Chronic musculoskeletal conditions associated with the cycling segment of the triathlon; prevention and treatment with an emphasis on proper bicycle fitting. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2012; 20(4):200-5. DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3182688fa0. View

3.
Barbosa L, Montagnana L, Denadai B, Greco C . Reliability of cardiorespiratory parameters during cycling exercise performed at the severe domain in active individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 28(4):976-81. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1f408. View

4.
Ryan M, Gregor R . EMG profiles of lower extremity muscles during cycling at constant workload and cadence. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 2(2):69-80. DOI: 10.1016/1050-6411(92)90018-E. View

5.
Zameziati K, Mornieux G, Rouffet D, Belli A . Relationship between the increase of effectiveness indexes and the increase of muscular efficiency with cycling power. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005; 96(3):274-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-005-0077-5. View