» Articles » PMID: 36230864

Novel Therapies for Unmet Clinical Needs in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36230864
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a very heterogeneous disease, with extremely variable clinical features and outcomes. Current management relies on risk stratification based on IPSS and IPSS-R, which categorizes patients into low (LR-) and high-risk (HR-) MDS. Therapeutic strategies in LR-MDS patients mainly consist of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), transfusion support, and luspatercept or lenalidomide for selected patients. Current unmet needs include the limited options available after treatment failure, and the consequent transfusion burden with several hospital admissions and poor quality of life. Therapeutic approaches in HR-MDS patients are aimed at changing the natural course of the disease and hypometylating agents (HMA) are the first choice. The only potentially curative treatment is allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT), restricted to a minority of young and fit candidates. Patients unfit for or those that relapse after the abovementioned options harbor an adverse prognosis, with limited overall survival and frequent leukemic evolution. Recent advances in genetic mutations and intracellular pathways that are relevant for MDS pathogenesis are improving disease risk stratification and highlighting therapeutic targets addressed by novel agents. Several drugs are under evaluation for LR and HR patients, which differ by their mechanism of action, reported efficacy, and phase of development. This review analyzes the current unmet clinical needs for MDS patients and provides a critical overview of the novel agents under development in this setting.

Citing Articles

Toward a more patient-centered drug development process in clinical trials for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): Practical considerations from the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS).

Efficace F, Buckstein R, Abel G, Giesinger J, Fenaux P, Bewersdorf J Hemasphere. 2024; 8(5):e69.

PMID: 38774655 PMC: 11106800. DOI: 10.1002/hem3.69.


Unveiling sex-based geographical disparities in myelodysplastic syndrome mortality trends in Spain (1999-2022).

Martin-Rojas R, Cayuela L, Martin-Dominguez F, Cayuela A Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; 26(10):2693-2700.

PMID: 38762824 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03503-7.


Long-term hematologic response after azacitidine treatment in a lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patient: A case report.

Loukidis K, Tschopp M Leuk Res Rep. 2024; 21:100412.

PMID: 38292515 PMC: 10825634. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100412.


The Importance of the Pyrazole Scaffold in the Design of Protein Kinases Inhibitors as Targeted Anticancer Therapies.

Nitulescu G, Stancov G, Seremet O, Nitulescu G, Mihai D, Duta-Bratu C Molecules. 2023; 28(14).

PMID: 37513232 PMC: 10385367. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28145359.


Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia/Myelodysplastic Neoplasms.

Madaci L, Farnault L, Abbou N, Gabert J, Venton G, Costello R Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(13).

PMID: 37444390 PMC: 10339965. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133280.


References
1.
Stahl M, DeVeaux M, de Witte T, Neukirchen J, Sekeres M, Brunner A . The use of immunosuppressive therapy in MDS: clinical outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort. Blood Adv. 2018; 2(14):1765-1772. PMC: 6058241. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018019414. View

2.
Kantarjian H, Giles F, Greenberg P, Paquette R, Wang E, Gabrilove J . Phase 2 study of romiplostim in patients with low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome receiving azacitidine therapy. Blood. 2010; 116(17):3163-70. PMC: 3324162. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-274753. View

3.
Santini V, Almeida A, Giagounidis A, Gropper S, Jonasova A, Vey N . Randomized Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Versus Placebo in RBC Transfusion-Dependent Patients With Lower-Risk Non-del(5q) Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Ineligible for or Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(25):2988-96. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.0118. View

4.
Santini V, Valcarcel D, Platzbecker U, Komrokji R, Cleverly A, Lahn M . Phase II Study of the ALK5 Inhibitor Galunisertib in Very Low-, Low-, and Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25(23):6976-6985. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1338. View

5.
Yang L, Qian Y, Eksioglu E, Epling-Burnette P, Wei S . The inflammatory microenvironment in MDS. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015; 72(10):1959-66. PMC: 11113192. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-015-1846-x. View