» Articles » PMID: 36230625

Automated Assessment of Breast Positioning Quality in Screening Mammography

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36230625
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Screening mammography is a widely used approach for early breast cancer detection, effectively increasing the survival rate of affected patients. According to the Food and Drug Administration's Mammography Quality Standards Act and Program statistics, approximately 39 million mammography procedures are performed in the United States each year. Therefore, breast cancer screening is among the most common radiological tasks. Interpretation of screening mammograms by a specialist radiologist includes primarily the review of breast positioning quality, which is a key factor affecting the sensitivity of mammography and thus the diagnostic performance. Each mammogram with inadequate positioning may lead to a missed cancer or, in case of false positive signal interpretation, to follow-up activities, increased emotional burden and potential over-therapy and must be repeated, requiring the return of the patient. In this study, we have developed deep convolutional neuronal networks to differentiate mammograms with inadequate breast positioning from the adequate ones. The aim of the proposed automated positioning quality evaluation is to assist radiology technologists in detecting poorly positioned mammograms during patient visits, improve mammography performance, and decrease the recall rate. The implemented models have achieved 96.5% accuracy in cranio-caudal view classification and 93.3% accuracy in mediolateral oblique view regarding breast positioning quality. In addition to these results, we developed a software module that allows the study to be applied in practice by presenting the implemented model predictions and informing the technologist about the missing quality criteria.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic capabilities of artificial intelligence as an additional reader in a breast cancer screening program.

Seker M, Koyluoglu Y, Ozaydin A, Gurdal S, Ozcinar B, Cabioglu N Eur Radiol. 2024; 34(9):6145-6157.

PMID: 38388718 PMC: 11364680. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10661-3.


Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions.

Taylor C, Monga N, Johnson C, Hawley J, Patel M Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 37370936 PMC: 10296832. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122041.


Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Topical Collection in 2022.

Stadlbauer A, Meyer-Base A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 36831407 PMC: 9954205. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041065.

References
1.
Alanazi S, Kamruzzaman M, Sarker M, Alruwaili M, Alhwaiti Y, Alshammari N . Boosting Breast Cancer Detection Using Convolutional Neural Network. J Healthc Eng. 2021; 2021:5528622. PMC: 8041556. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5528622. View

2.
Wang X, Li L, Xu W, Liu W, Lederman D, Zheng B . Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment. Acad Radiol. 2011; 19(3):303-10. PMC: 3274572. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.026. View

3.
Mackenzie A, Warren L, Wallis M, Given-Wilson R, Cooke J, Dance D . The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. Phys Med. 2016; 32(4):568-74. PMC: 4856544. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.004. View

4.
van Engeland S, Karssemeijer N . Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. Med Phys. 2007; 34(3):898-905. DOI: 10.1118/1.2436974. View

5.
Sechopoulos I, Teuwen J, Mann R . Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020; 72:214-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.002. View