» Articles » PMID: 36228963

Overall Survival in the OlympiA Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in Patients with Germline Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1/2 and High-risk, Early breast Cancer

Abstract

Background: The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety.

Patients And Methods: One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015.

Results: With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Δ 3.4%, 95% CI -0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Δ 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Δ 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Conclusion: With 3.5 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDFS and DDFS with no new safety signals.

Citing Articles

The Landscape of PARP Inhibitors in Solid Cancers.

Muzzana M, Broggini M, Damia G Onco Targets Ther. 2025; 18:297-317.

PMID: 40051775 PMC: 11884256. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S499226.


Thirty Years of BRCA1: Mechanistic Insights and Their Impact on Mutation Carriers.

Moser S, Jonkers J Cancer Discov. 2025; 15(3):461-480.

PMID: 40025950 PMC: 11893084. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-1326.


Genetic Alterations, Therapy Response, and Survival Among Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Richters L, Gluz O, Weber-Lassalle N, Christgen M, Haverkamp H, Kuemmel S JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2461639.

PMID: 40009381 PMC: 11866031. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61639.


Comprehensive genomic profiling can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Drobniene M, Breimelyte D, Sadzeviciene I, Sabaliauskaite R, Valkiuniene R, Meskauskas R Breast. 2025; 80:104423.

PMID: 39999766 PMC: 11891149. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104423.


Case report: Deciphering the clinical significance of a novel partial exon 10 duplication in a patient with triple-negative breast cancer.

Faversani A, Manuelli D, Barteselli D, Melloni G, Santaniello C, Corsaro L Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1497531.

PMID: 39980563 PMC: 11839443. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1497531.


References
1.
Fasching P, Link T, Hauke J, Seither F, Jackisch C, Klare P . Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency (GeparOLA study). Ann Oncol. 2020; 32(1):49-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.471. View

2.
Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord C, Tutt A, Johnson D, Richardson T . Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005; 434(7035):917-21. DOI: 10.1038/nature03445. View

3.
Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kummel S . Event-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386(6):556-567. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112651. View

4.
Marme F, Lederer B, Blohmer J, Costa S, Denkert C, Eidtmann H . Utility of the CPS+EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 53:65-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.022. View

5.
van Mackelenbergh M, Seither F, Mobus V, OShaughnessy J, Martin M, Joensuu H . Effects of capecitabine as part of neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy - A meta-analysis of individual breast cancer patient data from 13 randomised trials including 15,993 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2022; 166:185-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.003. View