» Articles » PMID: 36227628

A Medical-Grade Polycaprolactone and Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold System With Corticoperiosteal Tissue Transfer for the Reconstruction of Acquired Calvarial Defects in Adults: Protocol for a Single-Arm Feasibility Trial

Overview
Journal JMIR Res Protoc
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Oct 13
PMID 36227628
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Large skull defects present a reconstructive challenge. Conventional cranioplasty options include autologous bone grafts, vascularized bone, metals, synthetic ceramics, and polymers. Autologous options are affected by resorption and residual contour deformities. Synthetic materials may be customized via digital planning and 3D printing, but they all carry a risk of implant exposure, failure, and infection, which increases when the defect is large. These complications can be a threat to life. Without reconstruction, patients with cranial defects may experience headaches and stigmatization. The protection of the brain necessitates lifelong helmet use, which is also stigmatizing.

Objective: Our clinical trial will formally study a hybridized technique's capacity to reconstruct large calvarial defects.

Methods: A hybridized technique that draws on the benefits of autologous and synthetic materials has been developed by the research team. This involves wrapping a biodegradable, ultrastructured, 3D-printed scaffold made of medical-grade polycaprolactone and tricalcium phosphate in a vascularized, autotransplanted periosteum to exploit the capacity of vascularized periostea to regenerate bone. In vitro, the scaffold system supports cell attachment, migration, and proliferation with slow but sustained degradation to permit host tissue regeneration and the replacement of the scaffold. The in vivo compatibility of this scaffold system is robust-the base material has been used clinically as a resorbable suture material for decades. The importance of scaffold vascularization, which is inextricably linked to bone regeneration, is underappreciated. A variety of methods have been described to address this, including scaffold prelamination and axial vascularization via arteriovenous loops and autotransplanted flaps. However, none of these directly promote bone regeneration.

Results: We expect to have results before the end of 2023. As of December 2020, we have enrolled 3 participants for the study.

Conclusions: The regenerative matching axial vascularization technique may be an alternative method of reconstruction for large calvarial defects. It involves performing a vascularized free tissue transfer and using a bioresorbable, 3D-printed scaffold to promote and support bone regeneration (termed the regenerative matching axial vascularization technique). This technique may be used to reconstruct skull bone defects that were previously thought to be unreconstructable, reduce the risk of implant-related complications, and achieve consistent outcomes in cranioplasty. This must now be tested in prospective clinical trials.

Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001171909; https://tinyurl.com/4rakccb3.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/36111.

Citing Articles

Lost in translation: the lack of agreement between surgeons and scientists regarding biomaterials research and innovation for treating bone defects.

Laubach M, Whyte S, Chan H, Frankenbach-Desor T, Mayer-Wagner S, Hildebrand F BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):517.

PMID: 39506708 PMC: 11542434. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03734-z.


An innovative intramedullary bone graft harvesting concept as a fundamental component of scaffold-guided bone regeneration: A preclinical validation.

Laubach M, Herath B, Suresh S, Saifzadeh S, Dargaville B, Cometta S J Orthop Translat. 2024; 47:1-14.

PMID: 38957270 PMC: 11215842. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.05.002.


The Concept of Scaffold-Guided Bone Regeneration for the Treatment of Long Bone Defects: Current Clinical Application and Future Perspective.

Laubach M, Hildebrand F, Suresh S, Wagels M, Kobbe P, Gilbert F J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(7).

PMID: 37504836 PMC: 10381286. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14070341.

References
1.
Reichert J, Cipitria A, Epari D, Saifzadeh S, Krishnakanth P, Berner A . A tissue engineering solution for segmental defect regeneration in load-bearing long bones. Sci Transl Med. 2012; 4(141):141ra93. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003720. View

2.
Sahoo N, N M, Tomar K, Bhat S . Classification of the Residual Cranial Defects and Selection of Reconstruction Materials. J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28(7):1694-1701. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003752. View

3.
Horch R, Beier J, Kneser U, Arkudas A . Successful human long-term application of in situ bone tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18(7):1478-85. PMC: 4124030. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12296. View

4.
Yeo A, Wong W, Khoo H, Teoh S . Surface modification of PCL-TCP scaffolds improve interfacial mechanical interlock and enhance early bone formation: an in vitro and in vivo characterization. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009; 92(1):311-21. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32366. View

5.
Wagels M, Rowe D, Senewiratne S, Theile D . History of lower limb reconstruction after trauma. ANZ J Surg. 2012; 83(5):348-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06271.x. View