» Articles » PMID: 36226527

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Cervical Biopsy Under Colposcopic Vision

Overview
Publisher PagePress
Date 2022 Oct 13
PMID 36226527
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the cervical biopsy under colposcopic vision. This retrospective study was performed on 190 women, who were selected from a total of 412 cases referring for colposcopy in one year. All patients underwent colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). After the investigation of demographic characteristics and data confirmation, colposcopic characteristics were examined. Then, the diagnostic indicators and diagnostic accuracy of the cervical biopsy under colposcopic vision were determined. The mean age of patients was 35.51± 5.91 years. In smokers, the percentage of cancer and CIN3 cases was higher than in normal individuals, and this difference was statistically significant in terms of the frequency of cancerous lesions (P = 0.2). A comparison of colposcopic biopsy with LEEP has shown that the frequency of advanced cases in LEEP has been detected more, and the correlation coefficient (kappa) indicated the weak agreement between the findings of colposcopically directed biopsy (CDB) and LEEP methods. (k = 0.23). The diagnostic accuracy of the cervical biopsy under colposcopic vision for cervical cancer is effectively high. It is recommended that this procedure be performed to diagnose cancerous lesions; however, contrary to what is seen in colposcopy, malignant cases may be spreading and follow-up of patients can affect therapeutic performance.

Citing Articles

Detecting and localizing cervical lesions in colposcopic images with deep semantic feature mining.

Wang L, Chen R, Weng J, Li H, Ying S, Zhang J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1423782.

PMID: 39664173 PMC: 11633668. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1423782.


Radiomics-based machine learning models for differentiating pathological subtypes in cervical cancer: a multicenter study.

Liu H, Lao M, Zhang Y, Chang C, Yin Y, Wang R Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1346336.

PMID: 39355130 PMC: 11442173. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1346336.


A segmentation model to detect cevical lesions based on machine learning of colposcopic images.

Li Z, Zeng C, Dong Y, Cao Y, Yu L, Liu H Heliyon. 2023; 9(11):e21043.

PMID: 37928028 PMC: 10623278. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21043.

References
1.
Molina M, Carosi Diatricch L, Castany Quintana M, Melchers W, Andralojc K . Cervical cancer risk profiling: molecular biomarkers predicting the outcome of hrHPV infection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020; 20(11):1099-1120. DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1835472. View

2.
Muller K, Soergel P, Hillemanns P, Jentschke M . Accuracy of Colposcopically Guided Diagnostic Methods for the Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016; 76(2):182-187. PMC: 4771495. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-111504. View

3.
Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bruns D, Gatsonis C, Glasziou P, Irwig L . Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003; 119(1):18-22. DOI: 10.1309/8EXC-CM6Y-R1TH-UBAF. View

4.
Zuchna C, Hager M, Tringler B, Georgoulopoulos A, Ciresa-Koenig A, Volgger B . Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203(4):321.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.033. View

5.
Jung Y, Lee A, Lee S, Lee Y, Park D, Park E . Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018; 61(4):477-488. PMC: 6046358. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.477. View